🚀 go-pugleaf

This is a MIME GnuPG-signed message.  If you see this text, it means that
your E-mail or Usenet software does not support MIME signed messages.

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-7818-1118873823-0009
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Usenet Beavis writes:

> On comp.mail.misc, in
> <Pine.OSX.4.63.0506150620290.1077@pangtzu.panda.com>, "Mark
> Crispin" wrote:
> 
> Why did you put: "Re" in front of a post that has an
> empty Reference header? 

Why did you post to Usenet without taking your meds, Beavis?

> Who do you think you are fooling with such a childish trick?

Who do you think you're fooling with your pathetic attempt to pretend to be 
sane?

>> I got a message from a software developer in India asking a
>> technical question about the IMAP protocol (which I designed).
> 
> Really? Nice work.

Of course, Beavis, and if you weren't such a Beavis you'd know how to verify 
such a claim by yourself.

>> I responded.
>>
>> I was rewarded with a bounce and a C/R.
> 
> No. You can't get a bounce AND a C/R. If the

And you can't wipe yourself properly.  So, what's your point?

> mail bounced, then it was undeliverable, and
> wouldn't have made it as far as any mail filter
> that incorporates a C/R stage.

And if your grandma had wheels, she'd be a wagon.

> Are you SURE you designed the IMAP protocol? 

Stop being a Beavis, and verify it yourself.  Pretty much anyone around here 
knows how to obtain an independent confirmation for something like that.

Except for you, Beavis.

> You don't seem to know you email works.

Maybe, maybe not.  One thing is for certain is that you don't know how the 
Internet works.  You won't even read this post, Beavis, right?

>> I guess that he'll have to figure out the answer to his
>> question on his own.
>>
> 
> That's really Scientific of you. I suppose that if you
> went to a website and received a 404 error, you would
> conclude that the HTTP protocol wasn't functional.

And I suppose if you had a week or so you'd be able to explain what your 
thinking process is here.

MKaybe.

> As for how well C/Rs work in the real world?

They don't, Beavis.

> If they didn't work extraordinarily well, then all of you
> spammers and trolls wouldn't be so upset about them.

It works so well, Beavis, that only a couple of shitty ISPs use them.

> DUH.

Double-duh.

> Blather all day long on the Usenet, we couldn't care
> less.

Yes, you could.   Your own post proves so.

>        But what you can't do is get your garbage in
> our mailboxes.

And what you can't do is laugh at your own theme song.  It's time for an 
encore presentation of:

             MEET THE BEAVIS
(sung to the theme song of "The Flintstones")

Beavis,
meet our Beavis,
He's the wanking troll of comp.mail.misc,
Beavis,
reading Beavis,
Endless laughter is your only risk.

Watch him,
spew his blather all day long,
Never,
does it dawn on him how he's wrong.

When you
read our Beavis,
Make sure your bladder's empty,
Because it's laughs a-plenty,
And try not to wet your pants!

I DID NOT READ THIS POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOST!!!


--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-7818-1118873823-0009
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCsKjfx9p3GYHlUOIRAtaoAJ9mCvhmWXYH6Aqvqq7teLZ5M5fthQCdGjP7
G9dptucGzEoCFeVurD6MZmI=
=Agbl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-7818-1118873823-0009--