🚀 go-pugleaf

This is a MIME GnuPG-signed message.  If you see this text, it means that
your E-mail or Usenet software does not support MIME signed messages.

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-23741-1117050673-0001
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mimegpg

Beavis writes:

> On comp.mail.misc, in
> <1117027799.554148.164900@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> "tkedwards@optusnet.com.au" wrote:
> 
>> I misread the post slightly thinking you were talking about 2
>> ppl using the one account.
> 
> "kookery" eh?  I don't believe I will bother reading your
> other post.

I'm sure that his heart will be crushed to hear that Beavis won't allegedly 
read his other message.

> But once again we see how ignorant people stay ignorant.

You never fail to remind us, Beavis.

> That other post that seems to be from me, isn't.

Ok, I'll take your word for it.  Would you be kind enough to tell us if you 
wrote the following posts:

http://tinyurl.com/6dkxn - Beavis meets Bigfoot.

http://tinyurl.com/4otkh - Beavis gets kidnapped and molested by Xena, the 
Warrior Princess.

http://tinyurl.com/ifrt - Beavis figures out who wrote all those Microsoft=C2=
=A9 
ActiveVirus=E2=84=A2es.

http://tinyurl.com/2hhdx - Beavis joins a UFO cult.

http://tinyurl.com/24jqm - Life in Beavis's UFO cult.

http://tinyurl.com/3h6a5 - Beavis performs dental surgery.

http://tinyurl.com/ys6z4 - Beavis demonstrates all the skills he personally 
learned from Kevin Mitnick.

http://tinyurl.com/5qqb6 - Beavis's expert recommendation for secure logins 
over a network.

> Although I am sure it fooled you.

You did?  You mean, we were completely wrong about you being a raving mental=
 
case?

> (Take a look at the headers.)

Ok, I'm looking at them.  Now what?

> It's from a troll who is angry with me because I keep
> kicking its sorry but  and it can't get its crap into
> my mailboxes or get me to read its posts, regardless
> of which of its hundreds of aliases it is using at
> the moment.

FAQ question #5, below.

> I didn't read that post nor any others on this thread.

FAQ question #6, below.

Also, Beavis, would you mind explaining how you managed to squirt out a 
reply in this thread, if you allegedly haven't read it?

> Have a day.

Ok, it's a very nice day.  Thank you.

> AC


FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.20)

This is a canonical list of questions that Beavis never answers. This FAQ is=
 
posted on a semi-regular schedule, as circumstances warrant.

For more information on Beavis, see:

http://angel.1jh.com/nanae/kooks/alanconnor.shtml

Although Beavis has been posting for a long time, he always remains silent 
on the subjects enumerated below.  His response, if any, usually consists of=
 
replying to the parent post with a loud proclamation that his Usenet-reading=
 
software runs a magical filter that automatically identifies anyone who's 
making fun of him, and hides those offensive posts.  For more information 
see question #9 below.

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

1) If spammers avoid forging real E-mail addresses on spam, then where do 
all these bounces everyone reports getting (for spam with their return 
address was forged onto) come from?

2) If your Challenge-Response filter is so great, why do you still munge 
when posting to Usenet?

3) Do you still believe that rsh is the best solution for remote access? 
(http://tinyurl.com/5qqb6)

4) What is your evidence that everyone who disagrees with you, and thinks 
that you're a moron, is a spammer?

5) How many different individuals do you believe really post to 
comp.mail.misc? What is the evidence for your paranoid belief that everyone,=
 
except you, who posts here is some unknown arch-nemesis of yours?

6) How many times, or how often, do you believe is necessary to announce 
that you do not read someone's posts?  What is your reason for making these 
regularly-scheduled proclamations?  Who do you believe is so interested in 
keeping track of your Usenet-reading habits?

7) When was the last time you saw Bigfoot (http://tinyurl.com/23r3f)?

8) If your C-R system employs a spam filter so that it won't challenge spam,=
 
then why does any of the mail that passes the filter, and is thusly presumed=
 
not to be spam, need to be challenged?

9) You claim that the software you use to read Usenet magically identifies 
any post that makes fun of you.  In http://tinyurl.com/3swes you explain 
that "What I get in my newsreader is a mock post with fake headers and no 
body, except for the first parts of the Subject and From headers."

Since your headers indicate that you use slrn and, as far as anyone knows, 
the stock slrn doesn't work that way, is this interesting patch to slrn 
available for download anywhere?

10) You regularly post alleged logs of your procmail recipe autodeleting a 
bunch of irrelevant mail that you've received.  Why, and who exactly do you 
believe is interested in your mail logs?

11) How exactly do you "enforce" an "order" to stay out of your mailbox,
supposedly (http://tinyurl.com/cs8jt)?  Since you issue this "order" about
every week, or so, apparently nobody wants to follow it.  What are you going
to do about it?

12) What's with your fascination with shit? (also http://tinyurl.com/cs8jt)?


--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-23741-1117050673-0001
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBClNcxx9p3GYHlUOIRAp+MAJ9O1dkp3zLmQOKSkmGh50I4wIDi+gCfSbI8
A/biPhX9cTqYda9qUxZUZg4=
=lAB/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-23741-1117050673-0001--