Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #681Re: Making smail2.5 understand <user>%<site>@<site>
From: Robert A. Agnew
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 1989 17:06
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 1989 17:06
7 lines
930 bytes
930 bytes
In article <9672@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us> zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us (Jon Zeeff) writes: > >All you really want to do is have smail change % to @ if there is no ! or >@ present (ie, it looks like a local address). > Are you sure? According to RFC-822, % has a higher precedence than @. Don't we have to scan context in order to determine the routing?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<586@trwrc.RC.TRW.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ncrlnk!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!trwrc!agnewReferences:
<1989Oct5.053531.24832@egsner.cirr.com> <9672@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ncrlnk!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!trwrc!agnew From: agnew@trwrc.RC.TRW.COM (Robert A. Agnew) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: Making smail2.5 understand <user>%<site>@<site> Keywords: patches, smail2.5, %@ Message-ID: <586@trwrc.RC.TRW.COM> Date: 9 Oct 89 17:06:05 GMT References: <1989Oct5.053531.24832@egsner.cirr.com> <9672@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us> Reply-To: agnew@trwrc.UUCP (Robert A. Agnew) Followup-To: comp.mail.misc Organization: TRW/MEAD San Diego, Ca. Lines: 7