Re: Making smail2.5 understand <user>%<site>@<site>

Article View: comp.mail.misc

Article #692

#692

From: Jon Zeeff
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1989 20:26

9 lines
874 bytes

>Are you sure? According to RFC-822, % has a higher precedence than @. Don't
>we have to scan context in order to determine the routing?

No rfc (822 included) says that % has higher precedence that @.  It
doesn't.

-- 
Branch Technology                  |  zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us
                                   |  Ann Arbor, MI

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9675@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!b-tech!zeeff

References: <1989Oct5.053531.24832@egsner.cirr.com> <9672@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us> <586@trwrc.RC.TRW.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!b-tech!zeeff
From: zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us (Jon Zeeff)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Making smail2.5 understand <user>%<site>@<site>
Keywords: patches, smail2.5, %@
Message-ID: <9675@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us>
Date: 10 Oct 89 20:26:37 GMT
References: <1989Oct5.053531.24832@egsner.cirr.com> <9672@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us> <586@trwrc.RC.TRW.COM>
Reply-To: zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us (Jon Zeeff)
Organization: Branch Technology, Ann Arbor, MI
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message