Re: How serious is the at->@ problem?

Article View: comp.mail.misc

Article #834

#834

From: T. William Wells
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 1989 22:32

15 lines
1147 bytes

: >Strictly speaking, Manchester's astronomers have registered a semi- illegal
: >name. You are not allowed to register a domain name that is already used
: >as a higher-level domain name. If the .at domain was registered in the
: >British name scheme (it isn't - sigh), 'at.man.ac.uk' would be illegal.

Frankly, I don't believe this. It implies that one who assigns a
higher level domain name be aware of all lower level domain names
-- even those not in his domain. This is inconsistent with my
understanding of the rationale of the domain name system.

Someone care to quote chapter and verse?

---
Bill                    { uunet | novavax | ankh | sunvice } !twwells!bill
bill@twwells.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1989Nov25.223227.16124@twwells.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!novavax!twwells!bill

References: <3747@ccnysci.UUCP> <7867@ditmela.oz> <3945@amelia.nas.nasa.gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!novavax!twwells!bill
From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: How serious is the at->@ problem?
Message-ID: <1989Nov25.223227.16124@twwells.com>
Date: 25 Nov 89 22:32:27 GMT
References: <3747@ccnysci.UUCP> <7867@ditmela.oz> <3945@amelia.nas.nasa.gov>
Organization: None, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message