🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

4 total messages Started by John Stanley Sat, 02 Jan 1993 05:07
Re: Return-Receipt-To & forwarding...
#3325
Author: John Stanley
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 05:07
61 lines
2925 bytes
In article <davecb.725923251@yorku.ca> davecb@nexus.yorku.ca (David Collier-Brown) writes:
>  Your mail may be unreliable, but mine isn't: mine uses SMTP, 

Your mail travels via SMTP from originator to recipient? All the time?
The entire path?  You have proof of this, I assume. Or are you making
it up as you go along?

>If the mail doesn't 
>get there, I know about it because I'm doing end-to-end positive handoffs.

You may think you are from your misreading of the RFC's (and misapplying
them to systems they don't apply to), but you have no guarantee of this.
You have no control over the mail software that your mail passes through
once it leaves your site.

Even should this be true, here is a very real instance of mail being
sent and nothing being received as an error:

	I send mail to a system that is down. 

	Three days go by...

	The far end sends an error. 

	In the intervening three
	days, however, the disk controller of my mailhost lets the
	smoke out of one of the smoke containers. Being Christmas Eve,
	it isn't fixed for four days.

	Did the mail I sent get through? No.
	Did I get an error response? No.
	Has this ever happened? Yes.
	Do I treat mail as being reliable? Ha. Ha.

>Unless you use proprietary PC mailers, your mail uses RFC822 as a
>format standard, 

Really? There are NO other networks than the PC ones that pay no
attention to RFC822? You must not get out much. 

>  And the number of **formally unreliable** mailers can be counted 

There is a considerable difference between "formal" unreliability and
real world behaviour. Or are you unfamiliar with the term "bug"?

>on the fingers of a one-fingered man's hand.  Alas, he's growing more
>fingers as we speak, due to the existance of erroniously specificed and 
>designed PC mail programs.

You seem to have some strange idea that mail never failed to get through
before PC's were invented. You would gain a much broader view of the
world if you would remove these blinders.

>if skyking.OCE.ORST.EDU is losing mail, you should speak to your
>postmaster: you're on the internet too. 

I know you meant it as a red herring, trying to deflect the discussion
from your ridiculous claims about mail reliability, by it is rather
telling. If you really thought that mail was "reliable" then how could
skyking be losing it? Your accusation that skyking is losing mail is in
reality the admission that mail is NOT reliable. 
Re: Return-Receipt-To & forwarding...
#3327
Author: David Collier-Brown
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 18:52
38 lines
1960 bytes

|In article <davecb.725923251@yorku.ca> davecb@nexus.yorku.ca (David Collier-Brown) writes:
|>  Your mail may be unreliable, but mine isn't: mine uses SMTP, 

|>if skyking.OCE.ORST.EDU is losing mail, you should speak to your
|>postmaster: you're on the internet too. 

|I know you meant it as a red herring, trying to deflect the discussion
|from your ridiculous claims about mail reliability, by it is rather
|telling. If you really thought that mail was "reliable" then how could
|skyking be losing it? Your accusation that skyking is losing mail is in
|reality the admission that mail is NOT reliable. 

No, I meant it as a serious comment.  And I don't appreciate your
.plan entry:

========
[skyking.OCE.ORST.EDU] 
Login name: stanley                        In real life: I Found Chfn!
Directory: /usr/users/stanley              Shell: /bin/sh
On since: Sat Jan  2  9:51:29 PST 1993 on ttyp2 from c3d2.cs.colorado.edu
New mail received Sat Jan  2 10:54:07 PST 1993;
  unread since Fri Jan  1  7:39:38 PST 1993
Plan:
To crack every password on nexus.yorku.ca
=============

  I have already responded to the problem of user/administrator error:
you need to consider whether or not you're letting this get too personal.
I'll respond the the factual content of your scenario in another message.

--dave
-- 
David Collier-Brown,  | davecb@CCS.YorkU.CA | lethe!dave
72 Abitibi Ave.,      | 
Willowdale, Ontario,  | York Postmaster and
CANADA. 416-223-8968  | occasional sendfail(8) consultant.
Re: Return-Receipt-To & forwarding...
#3328
Author: David Collier-Brown
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 18:57
41 lines
1901 bytes
stanley@skyking.OCE.ORST.EDU (John Stanley) writes:
|Even should this be true, here is a very real instance of mail being
|sent and nothing being received as an error:

|	I send mail to a system that is down. 

|	Three days go by...

|	The far end sends an error. 

|	In the intervening three
|	days, however, the disk controller of my mailhost lets the
|	smoke out of one of the smoke containers. Being Christmas Eve,
|	it isn't fixed for four days.

|	Did the mail I sent get through? No.
|	Did I get an error response? No.
|	Has this ever happened? Yes.
|	Do I treat mail as being reliable? Ha. Ha.

  I tend to assume a normal operations secedule of backups when I
discuss mailhubs.  Yes, other things can interfere with mail.  In my
case, a Dash-10 can drop through the roof of my building (I'm under a
landing slope, see) and take out everything.
  However, I'm discussing mail, not acts of god.  Problems outside
the mail system and/or protocol get dealt with by solutions outside
the system and/or protocol.

  My operator restores the backup that cron took, and the mailer
delivers the bounce message. Several days late.

  By the way, we run a 7-day expirey period, just to deal with probabalistic
latency problems like that.

--dave

-- 
David Collier-Brown,  | davecb@CCS.YorkU.CA | lethe!dave
72 Abitibi Ave.,      | 
Willowdale, Ontario,  | York Postmaster and
CANADA. 416-223-8968  | occasional sendfail(8) consultant.
Re: Return-Receipt-To & forwarding...
#3900
Author: Christopher Davis
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 00:40
37 lines
2248 bytes
DC-B> == David Collier-Brown <davecb@nexus.yorku.ca>

 DC> No, I meant it as a serious comment.  And I don't appreciate your
 DC> .plan entry:

 DC> ========
 DC> [skyking.OCE.ORST.EDU] 
 DC> Login name: stanley                        In real life: I Found Chfn!
 DC> Directory: /usr/users/stanley              Shell: /bin/sh
 DC> On since: Sat Jan  2  9:51:29 PST 1993 on ttyp2 from c3d2.cs.colorado.edu
 DC> New mail received Sat Jan  2 10:54:07 PST 1993;
 DC>   unread since Fri Jan  1  7:39:38 PST 1993
 DC> Plan:
 DC> To crack every password on nexus.yorku.ca
 DC> =============

ckd@loiosh /src/mime2groff > f stanley@skyking.oce.orst.edu@jacobs.cs.orst.edu
[jacobs.cs.orst.edu]
Trying 128.193.32.13...
[skyking.oce.orst.edu]
Login name: stanley                        In real life: I Found Chfn!
Directory: /usr/users/stanley              Shell: /bin/sh
On since: Tue Jan  5 15:34:28 PST 1993 on ttyp6 from watneys.cs.colorado.edu
New mail received Tue Jan  5 16:37:06 PST 1993;
  unread since Mon Jan  4 13:22:37 PST 1993
Plan:
To crack every password on jacobs.CS.ORST.EDU

Cute named pipe trick, actually.  For whatever reason, I get "Service
denied" trying to finger at skyking directly; whoever's being paranoid
should just turn the thing off totally instead of trying to filter it,
because finger u@h1@h2 works fairly often...
--
Christopher K. Davis      | ``Usenet seems to run much like the Kif (or,
<ckd@eff.org>   EFF #14   |   for the TV generation, Klingon) high command.
System Administrator, EFF |   Whoever takes action and can be heard wins.''
+1 617 864 0665  [CKD1]   |   --Peter da Silva <peter@ferranti.com>
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads