Article View: comp.mail.multi-media
Article #201Re: Mass market MIME based e-mail question
From: Alasdair Grant
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 11:34
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 11:34
18 lines
1604 bytes
1604 bytes
In article <1992Oct13.054709.22181@netcom.com> ptrubey@netcom.com (Phil Trubey) writes: >Am I missing something here? Why is it that I seem to be the only person >who thinks that MIME based e-mail packages can take on the very profitable, >yet proprietary mass market e-mail packages like Microsoft Mail (aka Network >Courier), Lotus cc:Mail, Da Vinci E-Mail, etc? MIME is just a content encoding. The mail packages you mention are all transport mechanisms as well. So you would have to run MIME over something, like POP2/POP3/IMAP2/IMAP3/..., and these protocols are not stable enough to be attractive to many commercial vendors, I suspect. IMAP2bis is pretty new and even now they seem to be talking about replacing it with something from Carnegie-Mellon. Of course, each of these protocols is IP-based, which has its own problems in the PC/Mac environment, such as requirements for packet/NDIS/ODI drivers (and IP/IPX multiplexers if necessary, etc. etc.), and RARP/BOOTP servers etc. And isn't MacTCP a commercial product? What might be interesting is a PC-based MUA talking P7 and using MIME as a content-encoding.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct13.113431.7685@infodev.cam.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!ag129References:
<1992Oct13.054709.22181@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!ag129 From: ag129@cus.cam.ac.uk (Alasdair Grant) Newsgroups: comp.mail.multi-media Subject: Re: Mass market MIME based e-mail question Message-ID: <1992Oct13.113431.7685@infodev.cam.ac.uk> Date: 13 Oct 92 11:34:31 GMT References: <1992Oct13.054709.22181@netcom.com> Sender: news@infodev.cam.ac.uk (USENET news) Organization: U of Cambridge, England Lines: 18 Nntp-Posting-Host: bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk