🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <7552@ogicse.ogi.edu> schaefer@ogicse.ogi.edu, I wrote:
}
} [....  H]ere's a program that will
} perform a rudimentary check for what is being defined and how many
} definitions there are altogether.

I also meant to append the output of that program for curs_io.c in
particular; just as well I didn't for lang.perl, I guess.  Here it
is, with verbosity turned off and some "redefined" messages deleted:

% ckcpp -v -DSYSV -DM_XENIX curs_io.c
Predefined 2 symbols:
	M_XENIX
	SYSV
Total of 388 symbols defined, max was 388.

% ckcpp -v -DCURSES -DSYSV -DM_XENIX curs_io.c
Unrecognized #if expression  (!defined(SUNTOOL))
Predefined 3 symbols:
	M_XENIX
	CURSES
	SYSV
Total of 584 symbols defined, max was 584.

Damn, it doesn't understand parens around [!]defined().  Oh well.

Unfortunately, the above was not run on a Xenix system :-} so I can't
vouch for the numbers.  Here's what it looks like with the correct
definitions for my system:

% ckcpp -v -DCURSES -DBSD curs_io.c
Predefined 2 symbols:
	CURSES
	BSD
Unrecognized #if expression  (!defined(SUNTOOL))
Total of 576 symbols defined, max was 576.

Does this number of symbols look like it might cause problems for the
Xenix compiler?
-- 
Bart Schaefer          "February.  The hangnail on the big toe of the year."
                                                                    -- Duffy

schaefer@cse.ogi.edu (used to be cse.ogc.edu)