🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2663@cbnewsm.ATT.COM> ste@cbnewsm.ATT.COM (Shaun T. Erickson) writes:
} The summary line says it all really. I can't get it to compile at all, due
} to this.
} -- 
}  Shaun T. Erickson       Contracted to AT&T Bell Labs, Allentown, Pennsylvania

Ooops.  Sorry about that.  The fix is trivial, a declaration that should
have moved out of check_new_mail(), didn't.  Patch is appended.

I would like to ask that posters to this newsgroup avoid putting the
entire contents of their articles into the Summary: line.  The newsgroup
is gatewayed to a mailing list, and the Summary: header is not one of
the ones that gets propagated.  (The gateway software perhaps needs to
change to correct this?)  In the meantime, please at least say a little
about the topic in the body of the message.  Thanks!

~/src/mush/6.5/sun/update 
*** signals.c.0	Wed Aug  9 14:20:33 1989
--- signals.c	Sat Aug 12 11:28:19 1989
***************
*** 242,247 ****
--- 242,251 ----
      return 0;
  }
  
+ #ifdef SUNTOOL
+ static int is_iconic, was_iconic;
+ #endif /* SUNTOOL */
+ 
  /*
   * Display a summary when new mail has come in.  sprintf it all into one
   * buffer and print that instead of separate print statements to allow
***************
*** 316,324 ****
  check_new_mail()
  {
      int 	   ret_value;
- #ifdef SUNTOOL
-     static int is_iconic, was_iconic;
- #endif /* SUNTOOL */
  
      /* if fullscreen access in progress (help), don't do anything */
      if (ret_value = mail_size()) {
--- 320,325 ----
-- 
Bart Schaefer           "And if you believe that, you'll believe anything."
                                                            -- DangerMouse
CSNET / Internet                schaefer@cse.ogc.edu
UUCP                            ...{sequent,tektronix,verdix}!ogccse!schaefer