Article View: comp.mail.mush
Article #365Re: Feature suggestion
From: Larry Blair
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 1990 18:21
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 1990 18:21
15 lines
1078 bytes
1078 bytes
In article <6572@ur-cc.UUCP> Mark Sirota <msir@cc.rochester.edu> writes: =How about ~R!, which would inhibit this message from being recorded in the ="record" folder? That's a good idea, but an even better idea (IMHO) was a way to partially inhibit the save. Elm provides this via an inline control line (it also provides encryption this way). That way you could save the part of the mail that you sent with the 75k long uuencoded program that you might want to see later without saving all 75k. Last time I suggested this, Bart and Dan both expressed their displeasure with the Elm scheme. Maybe there's a better way, but I have no problem with mush looking for a line with `[nosave]' on it. -- Larry Blair ames!vsi1!lmb lmb@vicom.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Apr13.182140.3265@vicom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!usc!apple!vsi1!lmbReferences:
<6572@ur-cc.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!usc!apple!vsi1!lmb From: lmb@vicom.com (Larry Blair) Newsgroups: comp.mail.mush Subject: Re: Feature suggestion Message-ID: <1990Apr13.182140.3265@vicom.com> Date: 13 Apr 90 18:21:40 GMT References: <6572@ur-cc.UUCP> Organization: Vicom Systems Inc., Fremont, CA Lines: 15