🚀 go-pugleaf

An entity known as "Frotz" writes: 

>> Ideally, what I would like to do is get PCMush and Waffle to co-exist.
>> on top of some UUCP/UUPC implementation.  First, I need sources to
>> PCMush so that I can play with it and see what needs to be done to
>> Waffle by root!darkside.com...

Not sure exactly what this would require, but I am fairly certain
changes to Waffle would be reasonable in nature. I suspect it will
involve configuring Waffle's local delivery mechanism. Currently
this is not possible for users, but Waf/1.63 is going to be
significantly easier to deal with something like this.

Dale Weber responds:

>  I'd be _very_ interested in something like this also. I've got Turbo C
>v2.0 Professional here and wouldn't mind helping in such an effort. I am
>going to see if I can interface smail2.5/PC to Waffle also, as soon as I
>get my hands on the source, or maybe that of smail3.x (or even both). I
>see this rather large archive of smail.3.1.19 sitting on uunet that I
>have been tempted to grab... ;-) I haven't seen source for mush v7.1.1

I would not recommend porting smail3 to DOS. The sources are
huge, and an order of magnitude more Unix specific than smail2.5. 
There is someone who has smail2.5/PC almost working with Waffle, 
but I'm not sure if that person wants his name given out at this
time. This probably won't be as useful in a bit, since many of
smail's features will be "standard equipment" in v1.63.

>but I think that too is sitting on uunet just waiting... ;-) It _must_
>include source, but would be for UNIX and need re-porting over to DOS.

"Sir, that's NOT my idea of fun.."

   ...Tom

dell@vox.darkside.com / Thomas E Dell