Thread View: comp.mail.pegasus-mail.ms-windows
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Adolph B. Amster
Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00
Redundant .dll files
Author: Adolph B. Amster
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00
13 lines
904 bytes
904 bytes
I have two versions of the file "wldap32.dll" om my hard drive. They
are:
1. ver 5.00.1579.00 dated 3/17/99 size 90,384 bytes
It is in my windows/system folder
2. unnumbered version, dated 8/10/99, 102,912 bytes
It is in my pmail folder.
I would like to keep only one, and in my system folder. Which should
I save, which delete?
Thanks
Re: Redundant .dll files
Author: Jan Muszynski
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00
28 lines
1706 bytes
1706 bytes
dolph@ridgenet.net (Adolph B. Amster) wrote in <00000207160021.OUI00.dolph@ridgenet.net>: > I have two versions of the file "wldap32.dll" om my hard drive. They >are: > > 1. ver 5.00.1579.00 dated 3/17/99 size 90,384 bytes > It is in my windows/system folder > > 2. unnumbered version, dated 8/10/99, 102,912 bytes > It is in my pmail folder. > > I would like to keep only one, and in my system folder. Which should >I save, which delete? > > Thanks > > The unnumbered version is the one used by Pegasus Mail The numbered version is the MS one, probably their for use by OLE. The numbered version probably already *is* in the system directory, and the un-numbered one in the pmail directory. No harm in leaving things as they are, but assuming you want to use LDAP from Pmail then leve the unnumbered version and keep a backup of the other one, just in case you wish you had it down the road.
Re: Redundant .dll files
Author: Michael Salem
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00
24 lines
1733 bytes
1733 bytes
Adolph B. Amster: > > > I have two versions of "wldap32.dll" > > 1. ver 5.00.1579.00, 3/17/99, 90,384 bytes in windows/system folder > > > > 2. unnumbered version, 8/10/99, 102,912 bytes, in my pmail folder. > > > The unnumbered version is the one used by Pegasus Mail > The numbered version is the MS one, probably their for use by OLE. > > No harm in leaving things as they are, but assuming you want to use LDAP > from Pmail then leave the unnumbered version and keep a backup of the other > one, just in case you wish you had it down the road. From the way you write, these sound like two different and incompatible .DLLs which happen to have the same name (as they're both Windows LDAP 32-bit libraries), rather than the more usual case of different versions of basically the same file (though possibly incompatible rather than upwards-compatible). Is this so? Best wishes, -- Michael Salem
Re: Redundant .dll files
Author: Jan Muszynski
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00
42 lines
2597 bytes
2597 bytes
news@michaels.demon.co.uk (Michael Salem) wrote in <20000308.0150.10935snz@michaels.demon.co.uk>: >Adolph B. Amster: >> >> > I have two versions of "wldap32.dll" > >> > 1. ver 5.00.1579.00, 3/17/99, 90,384 bytes in windows/system >> > folder >> > >> > 2. unnumbered version, 8/10/99, 102,912 bytes, in my pmail >> > folder. >> > >> The unnumbered version is the one used by Pegasus Mail >> The numbered version is the MS one, probably their for use by OLE. >> >> No harm in leaving things as they are, but assuming you want to use >> LDAP from Pmail then leave the unnumbered version and keep a backup of >> the other one, just in case you wish you had it down the road. > >From the way you write, these sound like two different and >incompatible .DLLs which happen to have the same name (as they're >both Windows LDAP 32-bit libraries), rather than the more usual case >of different versions of basically the same file (though possibly >incompatible rather than upwards-compatible). Is this so? > >Best wishes, I suspect it is, in much the same way as the Pmail mapi dll's are incompatible with the Outlook dll's. They have the same (basic) functionality, but for different programs. The difference here is that (as opposed to mapi) the dll's can co-exist. Since the pmail version only lives in the pmail directory Pegasus Mail is the only one that will call it. Anything else will get the standard MS version sitting in the system directory. As long as one version isn't already loaded in memory when the other is called for there should be no problems, and I suspect the chances of the one being in memory are slim. If it happens just wait till it unloads and you're all set.
Re: Redundant .dll files
Author: Dale M. Nurden
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:00
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:00
19 lines
1529 bytes
1529 bytes
On 8 Mar 2000 22:49:38 GMT, jancm@bigfoot.com (Jan Muszynski) wrote: >As long as one version isn't already loaded in memory when the other is >called for there should be no problems, and I suspect the chances of the >one being in memory are slim. If it happens just wait till it unloads and >you're all set. This was the case with Windows 3.1, but is no longer a problem in Windows 95 and beyond (except, perhaps, if they are both 16 bit modules). -Dale -- Dale M. Nurden __|__ http://users.iafrica.com/d/da/dalen dalen-rcis.co.za | Highway Radio, 101.5FM dalen-iafrica.com | Christian Community Radio ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Author of TClockEx, the FREE taskbar clock enhancer. Spam proofing in effect: Please use '@' in place of '-'.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads