Article View: comp.mail.sendmail
Article #2695Re: what to do with <@a,@b,@c:u@h>
From: Jos Vos
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 10:09
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 10:09
19 lines
1277 bytes
1277 bytes
mcclure@viper.cs.unm.edu (Brent McClure) writes:
>We are re-working our sendmail configuration, and our mail relay
>host currently attempts to route addresses of the form:
><@a,@b,@c:u@h>
>to "a", however from what I've been reading from several places
>it sounds like many sites are simply throwing away the source-route and
>resolving straight to "u@h". Is this the recommended practice
>now and/or is there any harm in this?
No and yes. You should route to "a". I'm not sure whether it's forbidden
to route to "h" directly (although I think it is), but it's certainly
wrong to give up when that does not succeed i.s.o. routing to "a" then.
--
-- Jos Vos <jos@bull.nl> (UUCP: ...!{uunet,mcsun,sun4nl}!nlbull!jos)
-- Bull Nederland NV, Product Support Unix, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C1Cs75.Dnp@bull.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!nlbull!wilg!josReferences:
<C1A97M.3Jx@viper.cs.unm.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!nlbull!wilg!jos From: jos@bull.nl (Jos Vos) Subject: Re: what to do with <@a,@b,@c:u@h> Message-ID: <C1Cs75.Dnp@bull.nl> Sender: news@bull.nl (USENET Administrator Bull Netherlands) Nntp-Posting-Host: berk.bull.nl Organization: Bull, P.O. Box 22859, NL-1100 DJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands References: <C1A97M.3Jx@viper.cs.unm.edu> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 10:09:04 GMT Lines: 19