Re: smail vs. sendmail

Article View: comp.mail.sendmail

Article #3051

Back to comp.mail.sendmail Previous Next

#3051

From: Bill Wisner
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 1989 22:54

6 lines
835 bytes

Smail3.1 does speak SMTP. It also includes support for SMTP over UUCP.
The smail binary gets linked to several different filenames, one of which
is rsmtp. rsmtp, like rmail, is intended as the receiving end of UUCP
mail, but rsmtp expects to find things in SMTP format. It is also fairly
simple to kludge up Smail3.1 to do batched SMTP, if you really care to
bother.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6632@killer.DALLAS.TX.US>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!killer!wisner

References: <378@ispi.UUCP> <6918@galbp.LBP.HARRIS.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!killer!wisner
From: wisner@killer.DALLAS.TX.US (Bill Wisner)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail,comp.mail.uucp,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: smail vs. sendmail
Summary: Another shameless Smail3 plug
Message-ID: <6632@killer.DALLAS.TX.US>
Date: 2 Jan 89 22:54:04 GMT
References: <378@ispi.UUCP> <6918@galbp.LBP.HARRIS.COM>
Reply-To: wisner@killer.Dallas.TX.US (Bill Wisner)
Organization: HASA
Lines: 6

Reply to Parent Message