Re: is sendmail V5.61 available yet ??

Article View: comp.mail.sendmail

Article #3090

Back to comp.mail.sendmail Previous Next

#3090

From: Carl S. Gutekunst
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 1989 02:03

10 lines
673 bytes

Carl S. Gutekunst writes:
>Note that anonymous UUCP is a serious security hole

Peter Honeyman asks:
>how so?

Because of the loss of authentication. See the ongoing discussion in
news.sysadmin.

<csg>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <55450@pyramid.pyramid.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ncis.llnl.gov!ncis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!nsc!pyramid!csg

References: <53438@pyramid.pyramid.com> <854@mailrus.cc.umich.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ncis.llnl.gov!ncis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!nsc!pyramid!csg
From: csg@pyramid.pyramid.com (Carl S. Gutekunst)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: is sendmail V5.61 available yet ??
Message-ID: <55450@pyramid.pyramid.com>
Date: 18 Jan 89 02:03:08 GMT
References: <53438@pyramid.pyramid.com> <854@mailrus.cc.umich.edu>
Organization: Pyramid Technology Corp., Mountain View, CA
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message