-odq vs. -odb in 5.61's rmail

Article View: comp.mail.sendmail

Article #3197

Back to comp.mail.sendmail Previous Next

#3197

From: Paul A Vixie
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1989 07:22

8 lines
926 bytes

This is considered a plus in rmail because you will tend to get a lot of
rmail processes all at once after a UUCP neighbor calls up and dumps on
you.  Having each one queue rather than deliver in background tends to
trim the CPU spike.  If Ox and OX worked reliably, this wouldn't be nec'y.
--
Paul Vixie
Work:    vixie@decwrl.dec.com    decwrl!vixie    +1 415 853 6600
Play:    paul@vixie.sf.ca.us     vixie!paul      +1 415 864 7013

Technical Details

Message-ID: <VIXIE.89Feb15232245@bacchus.pa.dec.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!vixie

References: <2275@unmvax.unm.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!vixie
From: vixie@decwrl.dec.com (Paul A Vixie)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: -odq vs. -odb in 5.61's rmail
Message-ID: <VIXIE.89Feb15232245@bacchus.pa.dec.com>
Date: 16 Feb 89 07:22:45 GMT
References: <2275@unmvax.unm.edu>
Sender: vixie@decwrl.dec.com
Organization: DEC Western Research Lab
Lines: 8
In-reply-to: mike@turing.cs.unm.edu's message of 15 Feb 89 22:56:06 GMT

Reply to Parent Message