Re: Concept error Sendmail 2.1?

Article View: comp.mail.sendmail

Article #3266

Back to comp.mail.sendmail Previous Next

#3266

From: Jim Crammond
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 1989 16:01

12 lines
1085 bytes

No, not a concept error; but a design decision!!

Yes, it is assumed that the right hand side points to a site that
ni_send will know about.  Ni_send should resolve this since each
entry in the nrs tables has a dte address associated with it
(The ARs are resolved when the table is produced, so this is static data).

If you want to ensure that the RHS of the janet.chn is not itself an AR
then it seems to me that c-nrs should do it. I see no benefit of getting
sendmail to dynamically resolve ARs when the data is static.

-Jim.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <21665.8903141601@sophocles.doc.ic.ac.uk>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!mcvax!ukc!etive!glasgow!jac

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!mcvax!ukc!etive!glasgow!jac
From: jac@doc.ic.ac.uk (Jim Crammond)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail,mail.uk-sendmail-workers
Subject: Re: Concept error Sendmail 2.1?
Message-ID: <21665.8903141601@sophocles.doc.ic.ac.uk>
Date: 14 Mar 89 16:01:25 GMT
Sender: daemon@cs.glasgow.ac.uk
Lines: 12
Phone: 01-589 5111 ext 5065
In-Reply-To: Andrew Macpherson's message of Tue Mar 14 09:54:48 1989
X-Mailer: mail-news 2.0.4