Article View: comp.mail.sendmail
Article #3280Re: rulesets after resolved in ruleset 0
From: Steve Schonberger
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 1989 18:40
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 1989 18:40
19 lines
1272 bytes
1272 bytes
In article <1181@ur-cc.UUCP>, msir@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Mark Sirota) writes: > [...] (Note that this takes advantage of the IDA feature > that -bt does not automatically call S3 first. It's more challenging > without this. A simple way to avoid calling S3 first with plain sendmail is to do this in your test configuration file: S3 S49 # what's usually in S3 follows This causes S3 to become a do-nothing rule, and calling a do-nothing S3 first is as good as not doing S3. If you want to do S3 for real, just ask for S49 instead, until you get the configuration working, when you can remove the S49 line. (There's no magic significance about 49, that's just the highest rule number my copy of sendmail allows.) Steve Schonberger steve@raspail.cdcnet.cdc.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1667@raspail.cdcnet.cdc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!eecae!tank!shamash!raspail!steveReferences:
<44@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> <8119@csli.STANFORD.EDU> <2615@decuac.DEC.COM> <1181@ur-cc.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!eecae!tank!shamash!raspail!steve From: steve@raspail.cdcnet.cdc.com (Steve Schonberger) Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail Subject: Re: rulesets after resolved in ruleset 0 Message-ID: <1667@raspail.cdcnet.cdc.com> Date: 24 Mar 89 18:40:26 GMT References: <44@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> <8119@csli.STANFORD.EDU> <2615@decuac.DEC.COM> <1181@ur-cc.UUCP> Organization: Control Data Corporation, Arden Hills, MN Lines: 19