Re: Why is my MX sendmail broken?

Article View: comp.mail.sendmail

Article #3287

Back to comp.mail.sendmail Previous Next

#3287

From: Bruce Barnett
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1989 14:15

14 lines
1052 bytes

In article <86@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>, barnett@crdgw1 (Bruce Barnett) writes:
>I must be doing something stupid.

Actually I was just ignorant. But I am getting much better now... :-)

Thanks you netters. Yes, I had local before bind in /etc/svcorder.
I didn't set up the bind service, and I am talking over the responsibilities
of the person who did.

Lucky Me :-)

--
Bruce G. Barnett	<barnett@crdgw1.ge.com>  a.k.a. <barnett@[192.35.44.4]>
			uunet!steinmetz!barnett, <barnett@steinmetz.ge.com>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <87@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!itsgw!steinmetz!crdgw1!crdgw1.ge.com!barnett

References: <86@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!itsgw!steinmetz!crdgw1!crdgw1.ge.com!barnett
From: barnett@crdgw1.crd.ge.com (Bruce Barnett)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: Why is my MX sendmail broken?
Message-ID: <87@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>
Date: 30 Mar 89 14:15:25 GMT
References: <86@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>
Sender: news@crdgw1.crd.ge.com
Reply-To: barnett@crdgw1.crd.ge.com (Bruce Barnett)
Organization: GE Corp. R & D, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 14
In-reply-to: barnett@crdgw1.crd.ge.com (Bruce Barnett)

Reply to Parent Message