Re: sendmail parsing questions

Article View: comp.mail.sendmail

Article #3329

Back to comp.mail.sendmail Previous Next

#3329

From: Mark Sirota
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 1989 21:10

21 lines
1319 bytes

In article <701@arisia.Xerox.COM> Lovstrand.EuroPARC@Xerox.COM writes:
>In article <357@anvil.oz> michi@anvil.oz (Michael Henning) writes:
>> destination "relay_host" and a user part "user@machine1@machine2.dom".
>
> That is not a legal RFC822 address, please consider using something
> like "user%machine1@machine2.dom" instead.

That is not a legal RFC822 address, either.  Please never recommend the
use of '%' in addresses.  Please consider using something like

	@machine2.dom:user@machine1

Unfortunately, this is not quite legal either, is it?  I seem to recall
that route-addrs need an accompanying phrase and should be in <>'s, as in:

	Mark Sirota <@relay.cs.net:msir@cc.rochester.edu>
-- 
Mark Sirota - University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
 Internet: msir@cc.rochester.edu
 Bitnet:   msir_ss@uordbv.bitnet
 UUCP:     ...!rochester!ur-cc!msir

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1635@ur-cc.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!rochester!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!msir

References: <357@anvil.oz> <701@arisia.Xerox.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!rochester!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!msir
From: msir@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Mark Sirota)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: sendmail parsing questions
Message-ID: <1635@ur-cc.UUCP>
Date: 22 Apr 89 21:10:28 GMT
References: <357@anvil.oz> <701@arisia.Xerox.COM>
Reply-To: Mark Sirota <msir@cc.rochester.edu>
Organization: Univ. of Rochester, Computing Center
Lines: 21

Reply to Parent Message