Article View: comp.mail.sendmail
Article #3340Re: Re: sendmail parsing questions: "%"
From: John Diamant
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1989 18:51
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1989 18:51
26 lines
1550 bytes
1550 bytes
> > That is not a legal RFC822 address, please consider using something
> > like "user%machine1@machine2.dom" instead.
>
> That is not a legal RFC822 address, either. Please never recommend the
> use of '%' in addresses. Please consider using something like
Actually, it is perfectly legal RFC822. "user%machine1" is local-part and is
subject to interpretation by machine2.dom. It's meaning is not specified in
RFC822 (except that it must be intrepreted by machine2.dom and no one else),
but it is legal and as long as machine2.dom consistently interprets "%" as a
routing character, there is no problem.
> @machine2.dom:user@machine1
> Unfortunately, this is not quite legal either, is it? I seem to recall
> that route-addrs need an accompanying phrase and should be in <>'s, as in:
>
> Mark Sirota <@relay.cs.net:msir@cc.rochester.edu>
Right. The angle brackets are required for source routes.
John Diamant
Software Engineering Systems Division
Hewlett-Packard Co. ARPA Internet: diamant@hpfclp.sde.hp.com
Fort Collins, CO UUCP: {hplabs,hpfcla}!hpfclp!diamant
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1410011@hpfclp.SDE.HP.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!hplabs!hpfcdc!hpfclp!diamantReferences:
<701@arisia.Xerox.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!hplabs!hpfcdc!hpfclp!diamant From: diamant@hpfclp.SDE.HP.COM (John Diamant) Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail Subject: Re: Re: sendmail parsing questions: "%" Message-ID: <1410011@hpfclp.SDE.HP.COM> Date: 24 Apr 89 18:51:17 GMT References: <701@arisia.Xerox.COM> Organization: HP SESD, Fort Collins, CO Lines: 26