Re: %-@ formalization (was Re: sendmail parsing questions - my comments) - Article 3388 - go-pugleaf

Article View: comp.mail.sendmail

Article #3388

Back to comp.mail.sendmail Previous Next

Re: %-@ formalization (was Re: sendmail parsing questions - my comments)

#3388

From: Rahul Dhesi
Date: Sun, 14 May 1989 01:03

12 lines
1023 bytes

Now is the time for the powers-to-be to introduce the use of <..> for
bracketing within an address.  Then both <a!b!c>@d.e and a!b!<c@d.e>
will be unambiguous.

     a!b!<c@d.e>!<f@g.h>!<j%k%l@m.n>!user

As for the old complaint that addresses aren't routes, the answer is
that they frequently are, and the more different networks interconnet
the more true this will be in the future.
-- 
Rahul Dhesi <dhesi@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
UUCP:    ...!{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7196@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi

References:

<1635@ur-cc.UUCP> <53257@uunet.UU.NET> <89May11.183003edt.11589@neat.ai.toronto.edu> <89May13.164744edt.11600@neat.ai.toronto.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi
From: dhesi@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: %-@ formalization (was Re: sendmail parsing questions - my comments)
Message-ID: <7196@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Date: 14 May 89 01:03:05 GMT
References: <1635@ur-cc.UUCP> <53257@uunet.UU.NET> <89May11.183003edt.11589@neat.ai.toronto.edu> <89May13.164744edt.11600@neat.ai.toronto.edu>
Reply-To: dhesi@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Rahul Dhesi)
Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message