Multiple recipients in smail/sendmail

Thread View: comp.mail.sendmail

2 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

2 total messages Started by Matt Goheen Fri, 08 Apr 1988 18:53

#2727

Author: Matt Goheen
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 1988 18:53

22 lines
1625 bytes

This rarely happens here, but one of our users recently sent out
a mail message with LOTS of recipients.  Unfortunately, this
generated multiple copies of the data file.  Being a (somewhat)
conscientious network user, I was wondering WHY?  I have the
'm' flag set in the "sendmail.cf" file (for "smail" -- our external
mailer).  Does this option only work if the users are on the same
host?  All the messages first get routed to our only mail link
(rochester).  75% of the remaining messages then go on to rutgers.
Is mail not smart enough to break up "To:" lists when mail paths
diverge?  Why not (not that I volunteer mind you)?  Since the above
mentioned user may be setting up a mailing list in the near future,
this seems like a good time to solve this potential problem -- or
ignore it if there is no fix for it, but at least I've done my best...

BTW, what, pray tell, does the 'm' flag REALLY do -- have multiple
addresses only for the local host?  Only for messages where the
path is identical (i.e. destination host is the same)?

-- 
- uucp:		{rutgers,ames}!rochester!srs!matt	Matt Goheen 	-
- maybe-net:	matt@srs.uucp				S.R. Systems	-
- 	"We built some good machines, but they don't work no more."	-

Re: Multiple recipients in smail/sendmail

#2728

Author: Jeff Stearns
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 1988 20:20

34 lines
2055 bytes

In article <778@srs.UUCP> matt@srs.uucp (Matt Goheen) writes:
>This rarely happens here, but one of our users recently sent out
>a mail message with LOTS of recipients.  Unfortunately, this
>generated multiple copies of the data file.  ....

Matt, recall that sendmail passes each recipient address through ruleset 0
to find a {mailer, host, user} tuple.

Tuples are sorted by mailer and host.  You say that you're using smail, so
it's likely that all your tuples resolve to mailer==smail.  But be sure
that all hosts resolve to the SAME CONSTANT STRING.

You might expect that an address of the form "matt@srs.uucp" should resolve
to {mailer=smail, host=srs.uucp, user=matt}, but this is wrong.  
Instead, ruleset 0 should resolve this address to
    {mailer=smail, host=SomeIgnoredConstantString, user=matt@srs.uucp}

Now sendmail's sort phase will respect the "sumtiple recipient" flag you
mention.

Aside:
    Sendmail has changed for the worse in recent revisions; more than ever it
    insists upon passing TRANSPORT addresses through rulesets for HEADER
    addresses.  This point is a bit subtle and counterintuitive.  A close
    inspection of 4.3BSD sendmail' internal ruleset invocation will show
    that for most configuration files the user part should contain the
    complete domain address (not just the local-part).  Thus the solution
    I propose to Matt isn't merely an optimization.
-- 
		 Jeff Stearns
	 Domain: jeff@tc.fluke.COM
	  Voice: +1 206 356 5064
    If you must: {uw-beaver,microsoft,sun}!fluke!jeff
	   USPS: John Fluke Mfg. Co. / P.O. Box C9090 / Everett WA  98206

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads