🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.mail.sendmail
2 messages
2 total messages Started by Jim Crammond Mon, 07 Nov 1988 17:16
sendmail worm fix (1)
#2949
Author: Jim Crammond
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 1988 17:16
51 lines
2375 bytes
The following patch has appeared in a few places like sun-spots digest;
I'm posting here for those who haven't yet seen it.

	If you don't have source, apply the following patch to your
	sendmail binary.  SAVE A COPY OF IT FIRST, IN CASE YOU MESS
	UP!  This is mildly tricky -- note, some versions of strings(1),
	which we're going to use to find the offset of the string
	"debug" in the binary print out the offsets in octal, not
	decimal.  Run the following shell line to decide how your
	version of strings(1) works:

		/bin/echo 'abcd' | /usr/ucb/strings -o

	Note, make sure the eight control 'G's are preserved in this
	line.  If this command results in something like:

		0000008 abcd

	your strings(1) command prints out locations in decimal, else
	it's octal.

[ NB I tried this on my sun but it didn't work. However doing a strings -o
  of sendmail soon told me that on Suns strings(1) prints in decimal -Jim. ]

	The patch script for sendmail.  NOTE, YOUR OFFSETS MAY VARY!!
[ Sendmail 3.2 had the offset 124362 -Jim. ]

	This script assumes that your strings(1) command prints out
	the offsets in decimal.

		Script started on Thu Nov  3 02:08:14 1988
		okeeffe:tmp {2} strings -o -a /usr/lib/sendmail | egrep debug
		0096972 debug
		okeeffe:tmp {3} adb -w /usr/lib/sendmail
		?m 0 0xffffffff 0
		0t10$d
		radix=10 base ten
		96972?s
		96972:		debug
		96972?w 65536
		96972:		25701	=	65536
		okeeffe:tmp {4} ^D
		script done on Thu Nov  3 02:09:31 1988

	If your strings(1) command prints out the offsets in octal,
	change the line "0t10$d" to "0t8$d".

[ I use the debug option for testing, therefore rather than disable it
  I changed the "debug" command to a 3 letter command which does not
  show up with strings(1).  The sendmail binary is not readable by
  ordinary users so I think this is reasonably safe.  -Jim. ]
Re: sendmail worm fix (1)
#2969
Author: Randal L. Schwartz Stonehenge
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 1988 20:59
23 lines
1862 bytes
In article <16970.8811071716@sophocles.doc.ic.ac.uk>, jac@doc (Jim Crammond) writes:
| 
| [ I use the debug option for testing, therefore rather than disable it
|   I changed the "debug" command to a 3 letter command which does not
|   show up with strings(1).  The sendmail binary is not readable by
|   ordinary users so I think this is reasonably safe.  -Jim. ]

Eeek.  Any newsreader/creative-hacker on your system (or any system
that can open your smtp port) can just try a quick-and-dirty program
to cycle through all 26**3 three-alpha-char commands with very little
time between tries.  Not smart.  Not only that, but the tries won't be
logged.  At one second per try (very slow system, it'll be better than
that), you're looking at only 5 hours of attempts.  And you just told
them that it is there.

Beefing up security should not be attempted by the uninformed.
-- 
Randal L. Schwartz, Stonehenge Consulting Services (503)777-0095
on contract to BiiN Technical Information Services (for now :-),
in a former Intel building in Hillsboro, Oregon, USA.
<merlyn@intelob.biin.com> or ...!tektronix!inteloa[!intelob]!merlyn
SOME MAILERS REQUIRE <merlyn@intelob.intel.com> GRRRRR!
Standard disclaimer: I *am* my employer!
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads