Article View: comp.mail.uucp
Article #2785Re: Mixed format addresses
From: Willard Dawson
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 06:39
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 06:39
61 lines
3047 bytes
3047 bytes
nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson) writes: > In article <H9TkwB1w165w@willard.UUCP> dawson@willard.UUCP writes: > > How will that help? You'll still NOT deliver mail to valid sites. If > you're going to suggest that .UUCP be made a valid Internet domain, then > there should be some mechanism worked out to allow DNS to route mail to > a site in the .UUCP domain. No, DNS doesn't do that now. > > There is no such thing as a site in the .UUCP domain, and such sites > are not valid sites. willard.UUCP only tells me that someone, > somewhere, transports mail to a UUCP host called willard. I don't > CARE how you get your email. You could get it via carrier pigeon > for all I care. Would you advocate registering the .PIGEON domain if > you did? Why not register a .SLIP domain or a .PPP domain? The voice of the Internet Gestapo. Thanks, I'm really glad to hear that I don't exist, that I'm a non-site. > There is no point in trying to convince you that you're wrong; the > fact that people can't send you mail should convince you. I see that > you're getting a FQDN, so why do you continue to argue for .UUCP?? Did I argue for .UUCP? Or, have you totally missed the larger context I've been striving for? > The Internet has, in the past, taken the easy way out on this one, only > attempting to define mail delivery to sites that are provably on the > Internet. That, IMO, is rather short-sighted. "Good enough," perhaps. > Not, I say. > > I suppose that, before the advent of MX records and MX-smart mailers, > your statement would have been correct. It is now losing wrong. Is > crynwr.com "provably on the Internet"? No, I have no IP access at all. > > Now, you're probably going to reply that even though I'm not on the > Internet, my MX and SOA records are. Exactly. > So what?? I pay PSI $25/month > to maintain those records. If they piss me off, I go to someone else. > I don't care that I can't ``vi named.crynwr''; they don't need to > be changed because they work. Good for you. > They have a wildcard MX record for > crynwr.com, so news.crynwr.com and fax.crynwr.com both work just fine. > > -russ <nelson@crynwr.com> What canst *thou* say? > Crynwr Software Crynwr Software sells packet driver support. > 11 Grant St. 315-268-1925 Voice | LPF member - ask me about > Potsdam, NY 13676 315-268-9201 FAX | the harm software patents do -- dawson@willard.atl.ga.us (Willard Dawson) gatech!vdbsan!willard!dawson emory!uumind!willard!dawson Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<k1auwB4w165w@willard.atl.ga.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!emory!wa4mei!kd4nc!vdbsan!willard!dawsonReferences:
<725768036snx@crynwr.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!emory!wa4mei!kd4nc!vdbsan!willard!dawson From: dawson@willard.atl.ga.us (Willard Dawson) Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: Mixed format addresses Message-ID: <k1auwB4w165w@willard.atl.ga.us> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 93 01:39:31 EST References: <725768036snx@crynwr.com> Organization: Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814 Lines: 61