Article View: comp.mail.uucp
Article #2871Re: problems with the UUCP maps--duplicate node names
From: David Blackwood
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 21:18
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 21:18
38 lines
2630 bytes
2630 bytes
In article <C16D9K.pA@revcan.rct.ca> dave@revcan.rct.ca (David Blackwood) writes: >Automatic expiry of map entries after a fixed period of time. If you >don't renew your map entry by resubmitting it at least annually then it >simply gets dropped. That may not solve the duplicate name problem but >it would certainly go a long way toward eliminating non-existent and >inactive sites. Since I made the above comment, perhaps I should expand upon it. By "a fixed period of time" I didn't mean a month. Six months, a year, or even two years might not be unreasonable. All map entries carry a "modified on" date (#W) and an administrative e-mail address (#E). A simple shell script could generate an e-mail message to the administrative address [5 | 11 | 23] months after the "modified on" date to remind the administrator to submit a new map. A similar shell script could delete any entry that carries a "modified on" date of more than [6 | 12 | 24] months ago. Properly run sites should be reviewing and updating their map entries on a semi-regular basis anyway. Automatic expiry of entries should not generate any more work for a coordinator than there should be already and obviously the answer to the more work problem is greater automation. Should we do it? Driver's licenses do expire, even if you stop driving and don't notify them. House addresses also expire if the house no longer exists (a map entry equates to a house not to a resident of that house). Would it solve the duplicate name problem - no. Would it improve mail connectivity - probably. On the duplicate name issue, that could and should be resolved by the map coordinators refusing to register a name that already exists in the maps, not just in the #N line but anywhere in the connectivity information as well. (Perhaps connections to unregistered sites shouldn't be permitted either). -- D. J. Blackwood Room 1139, 400 Cumberland Street Systems Integration Manager Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0L8 Office Communications Division voice: +1 613 957 9305, fax: +1 613 952 1095 Revenue Canada, Taxation email: uunet.ca!revcan!dave, dave@revcan.rct.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C1L1vF.Kn@revcan.rct.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!infotax!daveReferences:
<1993Jan17.171046.11384@blilly.uucp> <1993Jan19.213256.21892@fasttech.com> <C16D9K.pA@revcan.rct.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!infotax!dave From: dave@revcan.rct.ca (David Blackwood) Subject: Re: problems with the UUCP maps--duplicate node names Organization: Revenue Canada, Taxation; Office Communications Division Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 21:18:49 GMT Message-ID: <C1L1vF.Kn@revcan.rct.ca> References: <1993Jan17.171046.11384@blilly.uucp> <1993Jan19.213256.21892@fasttech.com> <C16D9K.pA@revcan.rct.ca> Lines: 38