🚀 go-pugleaf

s3h@sapphire.gasco.com (Steve Harrison x5709) writes:

>In article <CAL7r5.G4L@draco.nova.edu> nadeem@alpha.acast.nova.edu (Nadeem Haider) writes:
>>I am confused now...
>>I had posted earlier that I had trouble when I tried
>>my zoomV32bis modem to UUCP from a remote host with 
>>a Trailblazer. I am using Waffle on my PC to talk to 
>>a Sun Workstation (SunOs) which provides the Internet
>>feed. Waffle UUCP always complains of bad packets
>>after a successful handshake with the remote machine.
>>BTW: I am using my v32 at 9600bps.
>>

>I do not have Telebit manual available but v.32 at 9600 would be odd
>for all but a few Telebits.

I don't know; how many Telebits, percentage-wise, in the field today are
of the olden variety that only offered 2400 bps or 9.6 with PEP (aka,
TrailBlazers)?

Certainly, most of the current line of Telebits offer 9600 at v.32, and
so I feel that Steve Harrison is incorrect, if you only look at the
current catalog.  However, if you include all the modems in the field...

So, are there proportionately more 9600-only-with-PEP T'bits out in the
field, or can most of them do 9600-with-v.32-as-well?  Any demographic
data available from Telebit on this one?

Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
-- 
Willard Dawson, BellSouth Advanced Networks, 1000 Holcomb Woods Pkwy Ste 412
Atlanta, GA  30076, Voice: +1 404 594 6737, UUCP: kd4nc!vdbsan!wdawson
Internet -> X.400:  /G=W/S=DAWSON/O=BSAN/ADMD=BELLSOUTH/C=US/@sprint.com
Percent hack:  wdawson%vdbsan@gatech.edu   ::   Standard disclaimer applies.