🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <MPG.113fe450a81ffafe9899d1@nntp.we.mediaone.net>, Carpet_Shark@hotmail.com wrote:
>In article <7b4fn1$2jb$1@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net>, 
>Sanibelcomputerspham@hotmail.com says...
>> In article <36d5765a.649132@news.flash.net>, nomorefromncc@my.address wrote:
>>  Well, you operate under a diferent set of moral values than I do.  When I go
> 
>> into a store and buy a video card, I expect to take it home and I expect it
> to 
>> work.
>>   What I don't expect is to be sold a known bad video card, that is NOT 
>> expected to work, and having to get in the car, drive all the way back, argue
> 
>> with the sales people, then get another video card, drive home, install into 
>> machine, and yup!  You guessed it....that one doesn't work either.
>
>Since when can a looser like you afford a video card? The only people who can 
>afford such things are people with real jobs, instead of zit faced brats like 
>you who just sit around on dad's computer attempting to promote your imature 
>agenda, which is simply a hostility towards any company that does business via 
>the usenet. All of your posts and the rest of your smelly butt-buddies in the 
>UPP are just a pack of liars. You can not show any proof about all these claims
> 
>of theft, credit card fraud, and other crimes.
>
>I kind of picture you as having a low slopeing forehead, living in a dirty 
>apartment in some college town with posters of Mao and Che'on walls, walking 
>mumbling about how one day the workers will break their chains as you stand in 
>front of McDonalds ranting about how the clown is a child molester.
>
>Usenet is a great outlet for people who might other wise be institutionalized 
>if they where out in public.
>
>Do you go there the newspaper and call up people and harass them about about 
>the prices in their classified ads?

  Hmmm, not bad, not bad.  As far as rants go.   At least you made me smile.

  I like the "yellow toothed" lawyer aspersian better though.  :-)