Article View: comp.ms-windows.misc
Article #1PC Tools 8.0 vs. Windows 3.1???
From: Todd Ogasawara
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 02:13
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 02:13
13 lines
1217 bytes
1217 bytes
I received my Central Point PC Tool 8.0 upgrade last week. Has anyone else noticed problem with the new RAMboost feature of the package? I decided to give it a try since the documentation claimed it did a better job than OPTIMIZE when used with QEMM-386 (6.01). After installing RAMboost I noticed that I had 10K *less* base RAM and that a number of applications failed when run in Windows 386-enhanced mode. Does anyone know if PC-Cache 8.0 works better with Windows 3.1 than SMARTDRV? Is it safe to use? :-) -- Todd Ogasawara, U. of Hawaii, Psychology Department BITNET: todd@uhunix INTERNET: todd@uhunix.UHCC.HAWAII.EDU
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov3.021314.16061@news.Hawaii.Edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uwm.edu!caen!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!news.hawaii.edu!uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu!toddShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.ms-windows.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uwm.edu!caen!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!news.hawaii.edu!uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu!todd From: todd@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Todd Ogasawara) Subject: PC Tools 8.0 vs. Windows 3.1??? Message-ID: <1992Nov3.021314.16061@news.Hawaii.Edu> Keywords: PC Tools 8.0 RAMboost Sender: root@news.Hawaii.Edu (News Service) Nntp-Posting-Host: uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu Organization: University of Hawaii Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1992 02:13:14 GMT Lines: 13