🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.multimedia
Article #118

Re: MPEG encoding time

#118
From: stephen
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1992 17:29
44 lines
2583 bytes
alves@calvin.usc.edu (William Alves) writes:
>Does anyone with experience in MPEG have a feeling for how long it takes
>to encode full-motion, full-screen video, with enough compression to
>play off a CD-ROM (c. 150k/sec)? I have heard that it would take even
>     [...]

leo@zelator.in-berlin.de (Stefan Hartmann) writes:
> I'm using the Xing Technology MPEG encoder, which works from 320x240
> TGA frames .
> It takes 1.5 second per frame to encode to a MPEG-file on a 
> 486 PC (33Mhz) !
> I think this is quite fast and all is done by software only !

ruben@europa.ee.uts.edu.au (Ruben Gonzalez) writes:
>This just seems too incredible to me. I can not possibly see how anybody 
>can DCT transform a 320x240 frame at that speed on a 486. 
>
>Furthermore I can't see how you could do the motion compensation for an 
>entire frame at that speed. The Motion compensation requires an extensive
>search around each 8x8 pixel block in the image, which amounts to millions 
>of searches just for a single frame.

mike@optimla.aimla.com (Mike Diehr) writes:
>I agree.  We have a MPEG encoder, which I believe is sun SPARC based, and it
>runs about 100:1. (i.e. 1 second of video takes 100 seconds to encode).

As I understand it, the Xing encoder currently only does I-Frames... that is
it does no motion compensation and uses empty B and P-Frames.  This way
the compression is faster and you still get 10 frames a second encoded in
a byte stream that is usually only about 50kB/sec (well under CD-ROM).
The quality of the image is more than satisfactory for viewing at 320x240
although it could use some better pre- and post-filtering.
(Disclaimer... I could be wrong about all this, but this is what I've been
led to believe)

I'm not sure how long their full encoder takes (with B and P-Frames), but
Stefan is right about their currently released encoder's speed.  As I 
understand the MPEG spec, their files are compliant with the spec, but
just don't use it to its full extent.

Stephen.

Stephen D'Angelo, IBM Multimedia Lab, Palo Alto CA
stephen@ibmpa.awdpa.ibm.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Aug5.172918.15082@ibmpa.awdpa.ibm.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!panews!russian.awdpa.ibm.com!stephen
References: <8LE5E6I@zelator.in-berlin.de> <1992Jul30.015410.5411@ccsd.uts.EDU.AU> <1992Aug4.190535.16650@aimla.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.multimedia
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!panews!russian.awdpa.ibm.com!stephen
From: stephen@ibmpa.awdpa.ibm.com
Subject: Re: MPEG encoding time
Message-ID: <1992Aug5.172918.15082@ibmpa.awdpa.ibm.com>
Sender: news@ibmpa.awdpa.ibm.com (News Master)
Organization: IBM PS Programming, Palo Alto
References: <8LE5E6I@zelator.in-berlin.de> <1992Jul30.015410.5411@ccsd.uts.EDU.AU> <1992Aug4.190535.16650@aimla.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 92 17:29:18 GMT
Lines: 44