🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Dec14.025934.11509@ccsnews.ccs.mt.nec.co.jp| sugai@ccs.mt.nec.co.jp (Masaru Sugai) writes:
|In article <24362@galaxy.ucr.edu> rhyde@picard.ucr.edu (randy hyde) writes:
|>It's easy to get 10 fps playback from MPEG *if you have the right source
|>material*.  It's also hard to get beyond 3-4 fps if you have bad source
|>material.  I've just about completed 100 hours of measurements on Apple's
|>compact video format and I can tell you that the source material makes
|>a *big* difference in compression ratios, data transfer rates, data
|>decompression, etc.  A stable background with only a little movement
|>works much better with these codecs than, say, panning or zooming the
|>camera.  Of course, MPEG won't be of too much use to most of us until
|>the hardware codecs come along.
|
|I strongly agree with you. I wish there were some standard data set
|available which enable us to make fair comparisons among touted products
|in the market.  I would like to hear from MPEG people on this issue.
|
|- Masaru Sugai,	NEC Corporation, Japan
|-- 
|Masaru Sugai   NEC Corporation Tokyo Japan
|   sugai@ccs.mt.nec.co.jp, masaru@world.std.com

Check out ICD's new entry into the real-time 24-bit animation market for the
Amiga. It really make MPEG look pretty sad.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James D. McIninch               |
gt1619a@hydra.gatech.edu        |    "Designing tomorrow's engineers today."
School of Applied Biology       |
Georgia Institute of Technology | 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------