Article View: comp.multimedia
Article #250Re: Future of fax?
From: Keith S. Freedman
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 15:30
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 15:30
23 lines
1630 bytes
1630 bytes
In article 11276@mindlink.bc.ca, Rick_McCormack@mindlink.bc.ca (Rick McCormack) writes: > >In British Columbia, a Canadian province on the west coast (Pacific Ocean-side) >the government sees FAX as a "handy source of revenue" (quotes are mine!). In >the latest budget for the province, the government has started charging sales >tax on FAX transmissions. Obviously, this tax must be collected by the >telephone company, who inadvertently become tax collectors thru their >accounting process. > It would seem that it is acceptable to charge a tax on fax transmissions if a company is charging someone to do the transmission for them, but this would be a simple sales tax. Otherwise, it would make sense to just read the document over the phone to someone, unless there are graphics in the document. I believe there has been some effort on behalf of the United States government to try to tax electronic data transfers of any kind (i.e. modem use, etc.). This has been met with great resistance and they have not YET been successful. --- Keith Freedman Los Alamos National Laboratory freedman@ilmen.lanl.gov
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr7.153049.28902@newshost.lanl.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!ilmen!freedmanReferences:
<11276@mindlink.bc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!ilmen!freedman From: freedman@bellman.lanl.gov (Keith S. Freedman) Newsgroups: comp.multimedia Subject: Re: Future of fax? Message-ID: <1992Apr7.153049.28902@newshost.lanl.gov> Date: 7 Apr 92 15:30:49 GMT Article-I.D.: newshost.1992Apr7.153049.28902 References: <11276@mindlink.bc.ca> Sender: news@newshost.lanl.gov Reply-To: freedman@bellman.lanl.gov Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory Lines: 23