Re: sound blaster vs. pro audio spectrum

Article View: comp.multimedia

Article #417

#417

From: efil laer nI
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 20:01

10 lines
1207 bytes

The pro audio specturm 16 is the best bang for your buck.  I had a SB Pro
and recently got a PAS 16.  The PAS 16 is MUCH MUCH better. It supports 16 bit
sampling at 44khz.  I have a 486-33mhz and it seems to create a little noise
when I sample that fast under windows, but it works fine under dos.  The Windows software is the best around.  I have put my SB pro in the closet untill someone
wants to buy it.  The PAS 16 supports Sound Blaster (Not the pro) so all my
old DOS software will work. Hope this helps!

-- 
Chris Hafey                      |  Yeah, I know.. I'm Still working
chafey@cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu  |  on my signature..

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug14.200113.10991@ecst.csuchico.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!sal.wisc.edu!rat!cindy!chafey

References: <1992Aug10.013710.14766@athena.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.multimedia
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!sal.wisc.edu!rat!cindy!chafey
From: chafey@ecst.csuchico.edu (efil laer nI)
Subject: Re: sound blaster vs. pro audio spectrum
Message-ID: <1992Aug14.200113.10991@ecst.csuchico.edu>
Keywords: questions...
Sender: news@ecst.csuchico.edu (no news is good news)
Nntp-Posting-Host: cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu
Organization: California State University, Chico
References: <1992Aug10.013710.14766@athena.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 20:01:13 GMT
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message