Article View: comp.multimedia
Article #541Re: Buying a multimedia system
From: Mike Dickerson
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 04:36
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 04:36
51 lines
3101 bytes
3101 bytes
Here's another brief update on things I have learned since my last posting. * The DCTV can *not* run all software on the Amiga. However, it is supported by most graphics software, just not things like word processors where it is of questionable use to process words in 18 bit anyway. Still though, this point bothers me a little - that it isn't that transparent that anything can be run on it. I think the point here goes to the Mac, with more transparent support for graphics. * In the current state, a Mac/68030 can *not* do full screen quicktime animations at any reasonable speed or smoothiness. To get this, you have to add hardware which is far, far outside of my price range. This point goes to the Amiga. * Although MPEG players exist for the Mac/PC, they aren't very good yet. MPEG needs hardware, they say, or at least much faster CPUs. People who emailed me about this say that it is a neat idea but not yet practical for useful work, and needs to be given more time to get "mature". Neither machine wins here. * The Amiga has special CPUs for things like sound, disk I/O, etc, which give it a higher throughput, which is wht it was able to do animations from HD (didn't use the CPU) whereas my 386 system of about the same speed can't, and the Mac has trouble too. Point here goes to the Amiga. * QT is scheduled for an upgrade which improves speed of animation by 2 to 3X. Alas, this isn't enough to get full screen at high frame rates yet. Well, I have almost made up my mind now, and mostly because of point #2 above. If I had infinite amount of money to spend, or at least more than I have now, I would go with the Mac. But since my budget is somewhat limited, I will end up with the Amiga system, as the Mac in that price range cannot do full screen animation in video resolution, which is a *must* for what I want to do. Again thanks to everyone for the help in choosing this system. I learned a lot about them both in the last few days, and I found the choice was harder than I thought, because they both had strenghts and weaknesses which made it a "fuzzy" choice. But since full screen animation is what I want to do, I think Quicktime isn't quite there yet. Maybe if I was going to buy a system in 2 or 3 years I would make a different choice based on the improvements to QT. But right now, it would be too expensive to get a QT system to meet my needs. I plan to get an Amiga 3000 with 16 Mb RAM, 120 Mb HD, and DCTV for hardware. Maybe I'll expand the memory later, and add a removable hard disk, but right now I can't afford those things yet. /M
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep9.043626.9949@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!mdickerReferences:
<1992Sep4.151113.3583@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.multimedia Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!mdicker From: mdicker@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mike Dickerson) Subject: Re: Buying a multimedia system Message-ID: <1992Sep9.043626.9949@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> Sender: usenet@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (netnews admin account) Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci. References: <1992Sep4.151113.3583@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 04:36:26 GMT Lines: 51