Article View: comp.multimedia
Article #569Death Knell for DVI?????
From: Allan TEO
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 03:18
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 03:18
49 lines
2807 bytes
2807 bytes
Here is a message I found... >>>>>>> The word is out that Intel has just cancelled the development of the "V3" DVI chip. This is a blow to all of us who have a stake in the future of DVI as one of the predominent players in the MM game. This chip was supposed to be the successor to the PB/DB silicon on the current AM-II boards, and would have made DVI processing fast and powerful enough to do real time MPEG decompression, Px64, PLV X.X,,RTV X.X, as well as a whole host of other features missing or incomplete in the current chips. This is the chip that Intel DVI proponents have been touting for the past year or two, and the foundation of Intel's migration plans for DVI. A lot of third-party developers, particularly those with plans to port DVI to other platforms (Sun, SGI, and others) have been awaiting details on this chip. It also figured into plans to develop true multimedia digital network capabilities and teleconferencing. Intel will try to alleviate our concerns by telling us that they intend to focus on making the PB/DB silicon more powerful and capable. My guess is that they will try to put as bright a light as possible on this disturbing bailout. We have observed Intel going through a not-too-subtle plan to divorce themselves from DVI, and return totally to their chip-building roots. That would be fine, once DVI is well-established as an Industry standard for multimedia development and delivery. The danger of scaling back at this point is that DVI is NOT well-established or mature. It still needs the kind of commitment and support only a company as large as Intel can provide. There are a lot of competing technologies out there, and one or two of them are distinct competitors to DVI. This is a bad signal and very ill-timed. This recalls shades of RCA's (funny, same place DVI got it's start) foray into the videodisk market with their CED videodisc system. They pulled out in mid-stream to the tune of a $400M loss (or something like that). There is probably not too much we poor developers can do to change Intel's mind at this point. It wouldn't hurt to register a complaint with the powers to be. I'll get some names and phone numbers, and post them later today or tomorrow. This is a bleak moment for DVI!! Note: These are my own ideas, and do not necessarily represent those of Southwest Research Institute. ANY COMMENTS ANYBODY??????????
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<52520008@hpsgm2.sgp.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!hpscdc!hplextra!hpcc05!hpsgm2!teoallanShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: teoallan@hpsgm2.sgp.hp.com (Allan TEO) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 03:18:30 GMT Subject: Death Knell for DVI????? Message-ID: <52520008@hpsgm2.sgp.hp.com> Organization: HP Singapore Notes-Server Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!hpscdc!hplextra!hpcc05!hpsgm2!teoallan Newsgroups: comp.multimedia Lines: 50