Thread View: comp.multimedia
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by Eva Cheung
Thu, 08 Oct 1992 01:50
Film Recorder & Film Maker
Author: Eva Cheung
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1992 01:50
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1992 01:50
3 lines
646 bytes
646 bytes
Are you using Film Recorder or Film Maker? Any comments on Kodak's products? We'll use on both PC and Mac platform. Do you have any experience on these products? Any advises are appreciated. Thanks.
Re: Film Recorder & Film Maker
Author: Richard J. McDougald
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1992 20:57
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1992 20:57
21 lines
1454 bytes
1454 bytes
In article <1992Oct8.015051.2816@hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk> eva@next.csc.cuhk.hk (Eva Cheung) writes:
>Are you using Film Recorder or Film Maker? Any comments on Kodak's
>products? We'll use on both PC and Mac platform. Do you have any
>experience on these products? Any advises are appreciated. Thanks.
sent you (as for as I know) E-Mail about your questions. If you don't get
it, respond here...
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Mac McDougald *
The Photography Center * Any opinions expressed herein
Rm. 91 Comm. Bldg. * are not necessarily (actually,
Univ. of Tenn. Knoxville 37916 * are almost CERTAINLY NOT) those
mac@univ_rel (campus LAN) * of the University of Tennessee.
ur.utk.edu *
mac@utkvx.bitnet *
(615-974-3449) *
(615-974-6435) FAX *
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Re: Film Recorder & Film Maker
Author: SHUK C YIP
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 04:22
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 04:22
8 lines
1012 bytes
1012 bytes
In article <1992Oct8.015051.2816@hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk> eva@next.csc.cuhk.hk (Eva Cheung) writes: >Are you using Film Recorder or Film Maker? Any comments on Kodak's >products? We'll use on both PC and Mac platform. Do you have any >experience on these products? Any advises are appreciated. Thanks. I recommend Polaroid instead of Kodak. It was awarded by PC Magazine as Editor Choice. I use it daily with my Amiga. Certainly, it also supports PC and MAC. Two models are CI-3000 and CI-5000.
Re: Film Recorder & Film Maker
Author: Richard J. McDougald
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 17:45
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 17:45
29 lines
2107 bytes
2107 bytes
In article <1992Oct9.042204.17897@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca> cs902125@ariel.yorku.ca (SHUK C YIP) writes:
>In article <1992Oct8.015051.2816@hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk> eva@next.csc.cuhk.hk (Eva Cheung) writes:
>>Are you using Film Recorder or Film Maker? Any comments on Kodak's
>>products? We'll use on both PC and Mac platform. Do you have any
>>experience on these products? Any advises are appreciated. Thanks.
>I recommend Polaroid instead of Kodak. It was awarded by PC Magazine as
>Editor Choice. I use it daily with my Amiga. Certainly, it also supports
>PC and MAC. Two models are CI-3000 and CI-5000.
The Poloroid stuff is pretty good for the money, but because of the not
top of the line "flying spot" they use, they do not render true 4K
resolution. They do scan 4,000 times all right, but since the flying spot
is physically larger than in the next price range of recorders, you get the
equivelent of something inbetween 2.5 and 3.0K resolution on 35mm. I have
many critical customers that would notice the difference.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Mac McDougald *
The Photography Center * Any opinions expressed herein
Rm. 91 Comm. Bldg. * are not necessarily (actually,
Univ. of Tenn. Knoxville 37916 * are almost CERTAINLY NOT) those
mac@ur.utk.edu * of The University of Tennessee.
mac@utkvx.bitnet *
(615-974-3449) *
(615-974-6435) FAX *
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads