Article View: comp.music
Article #4087Re: HELP choosing a PC-based Sequencer/Multitrack
From: andrew Jenkins
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 1995 00:00
51 lines
3717 bytes
3717 bytes
In article <406bb7$11k@news.cc.utah.edu>, bq2369@u.cc.utah.edu (bruce quaglia) says: > >andrew Jenkins (andrewj@lmsmgr.lerc.nasa.gov) wrote: >: In article <405ce7$ha1@news.cc.utah.edu>, bq2369@u.cc.utah.edu (bruce quaglia) says: >: As for digital audio capabilities, Bruce is wrong. Standard >: MCI commands can be handled, so wav files can both be created >: and played back within CW. This isn't to say that the dig-audio >: is pro quality or anything, but it *can* do some things. > > I'm not wrong at all. You can insert small .wav files > here and there and that's not the same thing as what > the original poster was inquiring about. I'm just quoting what you wrote... >: > It has no capacity for digital audio >: > at all however. This is not true. No capacity is no capacity. > You work for 12-tone systems or just own alot of > their stock? You awfully zealous about ....software...!! No, but when a noviate to the PC platform asks questions, I feel it's my duty to answer them with clarity. And yes, I am zealous about software, having spent an awful amount of time using both good and bad software. Cubase for the PC is a great idea, but their implementation stinks. Since both Cubase and Cakewalk Pro are both relatively expensive (for PC beginners), it's very important for them to be satisfied with the performance of their systems. Pointing out programs which have exhibited a great deal of problems is something I would hope all of us would do. It both helps the user, and helps to stop the companies that are guilty of poor programming form profitting from a user's inexperience. > Since you're so savvy on CW, do you know if the CW with > digital audio is entirely new product or will it be available > at all for an "upgrade" price to curent registered CW-pro > owners? (Wishful thinking...) According to the grapevine, it will be a separate product, though current users will have a discount price much like an upgrade. I doubt it will be the standard $50 though. The reasoning for creating a separate product is, as I understand it, is that it wouldn't be fair to force users through this upgrade path, since many wouldn't need the dig audio, and therefore the added cost (This *is* to be expected <g>) to the "upgrade" would burden those users who don't want or need the added capabilities. I believe the new product will have a different name as well, but will integrate both the capabilities of CW Pro and the digital audio "stuff". aj
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4081kp$p4m@sulawesi.lerc.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4015f0$5a4@phantom.oit.gatech.edu> <40372n$n3@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <403fai$53u@acmex.gatech.edu> <4054hb$ib9@acmey.gatech.edu> <405ce7$ha1@ne <406bb7$11k@news.cc.utah.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1106b7,f86535aabcc7e9b6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1106b7,public X-Google-Thread: fcd51,f86535aabcc7e9b6 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcd51,public X-Google-Thread: fd490,f86535aabcc7e9b6 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd490,public X-Google-Thread: f49f0,f86535aabcc7e9b6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf49f0,public X-Google-Thread: 10f5c4,f86535aabcc7e9b6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f5c4,public X-Google-Thread: 144083,f86535aabcc7e9b6 X-Google-Attributes: gid144083,public From: andrewj@lmsmgr.lerc.nasa.gov (andrew Jenkins) Subject: Re: HELP choosing a PC-based Sequencer/Multitrack Date: 1995/08/08 Message-ID: <4081kp$p4m@sulawesi.lerc.nasa.gov> X-Deja-AN: 107724704 distribution: inet references: <4015f0$5a4@phantom.oit.gatech.edu> <40372n$n3@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <403fai$53u@acmex.gatech.edu> <4054hb$ib9@acmey.gatech.edu> <405ce7$ha1@ne <406bb7$11k@news.cc.utah.edu> organization: 2.2 second drop tower newsgroups: comp.music,git.club.musicians-net,git.music.class.3800s,rec.music.compose,rec.music.makers.marketplace,comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard.music