Article View: comp.org.acm
Article #100Re: PBS show is NOT historically correct!
From: Steve Hawtin
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 07:49
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 07:49
45 lines
2998 bytes
2998 bytes
In article <11397@ksr.com>, jfw@ksr.com (John F. Woods) writes: > erspert@athena.mit.edu (Ellen R. Spertus) writes: > >In article <1992Apr10.183002.5425@sctc.com> smith@sctc.com (Rick Smith) writes: > >>dab@moxie.moxie.oswego.edu (David Alan Bozak) writes: > >>>I was appalled that there was NO mention of Atanasoff. > >>The show is titled "The Machine that Changed the World." ENIAC > >>and its progeny changed the world. Atanasoff's machine didn't. > >I don't agree with this objection. Konrad Zuse's machine didn't > >change the world, but he was featured. > > In another newsgroup (comp.arch? sci.electronics? I don't remember offhand), > someone posted a message from the producer of the show on why they left > Atanasoff out. Basically, it's because his machine went nowhere, and to > give enough background to include his contribution in context would have > taken too much time. The producer pointed out that they were careful to > refer to ENIAC as the "first programmable electronic computer", though > without the context of Atanasoff's nonprogrammable machine, the distinction > does become lost. In the BBC version (called "The Dream Machine") I thought the title of "first working programmable electronic computer" was applied to the Manchester University machine, how different was "The Machine that Changed the World" from "The Dream Machine". I must say I thought the running order of the BBC series was a touch odd it did tend to spend a long time talking about developments in the US, then go on to discuss earlier devlopments in the UK in a "separate" section. Has all the stuff about Alan Turing's vital contribution via Bletchley Park and his visit to the US in 1941 (?) been removed? > As to why Zuse's machine was featured (despite going nowhere) and Atanasoff's > wasn't, I would guess it was because Zuse's machine was a more interesting > failure; it provided the bridge between Babbage's "Steam Age" machine (:-) > and Mauchly&Eckert's "Electronic Age" machine (being an "Electric Age" > machine). Atanasoff's computer was an Electronic Age attempt that went > nowhere, and would have broken the flow of the presentation. Steve Hawtin EMAIL : steve@geosys.co.uk Oilfield Systems Ltd., BANGNET : ...!uunet!mcsun!uknet!geosys!steve Worthy Park House, PHONE : +44 962 882448 Abbots Worthy, Winchester, FAX : +44 962 885085 Hants. SO21 1AN, UK.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr14.074920.1436@geosys.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!pyrltd!geosys!steveReferences:
<11397@ksr.com> <DAB.92Apr10121110@moxie.moxie.oswego.edu> <1992Apr10.183002.5425@sctc.com> <1992Apr11.184214.13375@athena.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!pyrltd!geosys!steve From: steve@geosys.co.uk (Steve Hawtin) Newsgroups: comp.org.acm Subject: Re: PBS show is NOT historically correct! Message-ID: <1992Apr14.074920.1436@geosys.co.uk> Date: 14 Apr 92 07:49:20 GMT References: <11397@ksr.com> <DAB.92Apr10121110@moxie.moxie.oswego.edu> <1992Apr10.183002.5425@sctc.com> <1992Apr11.184214.13375@athena.mit.edu> Sender: usenet@geosys.co.uk Reply-To: steve@geosys.co.uk Distribution: comp Organization: Oilfield Systems Ltd. Lines: 45 Nntp-Posting-Host: thorin