Article View: comp.org.acm
Article #115Re: Who's On First and Historical Correctness
From: Rick Smith
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 21:34
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 21:34
29 lines
1634 bytes
1634 bytes
jones@pyrite.cs.uiowa.edu (Douglas W. Jones) writes: >"What was the first programmable computer?" is ill specified question. >[story of ancient octal dumps from ILLIAC dating from the late '40s] >To make such dumps, there must have been a considerable amount of working >hardware -- not an entire working computer, but enough to step throug >memory and convert binary to octal for printing. My suspicion is that >they used the CPU's data paths to do this, with a very simplified control >unit that turned what they had into a memory tester, but I didn't have >time to find out if this was so. >I also got the impression that they were running programs with just add, >jump, load and store instructions for a considerable time ... Thank you for poking a hole in one of the few 'firsts' I thought still held up! Things get _really_ uncertain when you consider that the octal dumper (memory tester?) probably operated via a primitive control store; quite likely if it was influenced by the Whirlwind design. Now, if you have a program in control storage, how's that different from a RISC program in ROM?? Who's on First, anyway? Rick. smith@sctc.com arden hills, minnesota
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr16.213458.4086@sctc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!sctc.com!smithReferences:
<1992Apr15.152445.5780@sctc.com> <12209@ns-mx.uiowa.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!sctc.com!smith From: smith@sctc.com (Rick Smith) Newsgroups: comp.org.acm,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Who's On First and Historical Correctness Message-ID: <1992Apr16.213458.4086@sctc.com> Date: 16 Apr 92 21:34:58 GMT Article-I.D.: sctc.1992Apr16.213458.4086 References: <1992Apr15.152445.5780@sctc.com> <12209@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> Organization: SCTC Lines: 29