🚀 go-pugleaf

In <STEVE.92Sep14135214@diana.Advansoft.COM> steve@Advansoft.COM
 (Steve Savitzky) writes:

>In article <1992Sep11.172424.29251@tandem.com> tvv@tandem.com
 (Tom Van Vleck) writes:
> The latest issue of CACM is much easier to read.  [...]
>              Many thanks!

>I'd like to second this, and thank the editors publicly for finally
>listening to our comments.  I may actually go back to reading CACM as
>soon as it comes in instead of throwing it on my stack of stuff to get
>to eventually.  Hooray!

>--
>\ --Steve Savitzky--  [...]

Hold on a mo !  Which issue are we talking about ?
Your latest issue isn't necessarily the same as my latest issue.
The August 1992 issue ( 35(8) ) is not yet a thing of beauty.
The layout on p.20 is breathtakingly bad; p.64 is not really any better,
while p.124 is plain ugly.

Can I live in the hope that September will bring a revelation ?

Douglas Brotchie
University of Iceland