Article View: comp.org.acm
Article #389Re: New format of CACM
From: Paul Martz
Date: Thu, 09 May 1991 14:32
Date: Thu, 09 May 1991 14:32
16 lines
1216 bytes
1216 bytes
Everybody seems to be on the "anti new CACM format" bandwagon. Lighten up! Has everyone forgotton how sterile, boring, and unimaginative the old format was? It was such an insult to my humanity, I rarely read articles even if they interested me. This new format makes the magazine much less of a tooth-pull to look at. Now the new format isn't perfect, but how many magazine formats *are* perfect? The point, for me at least, is: it's much better than the old format, and I am glad someone finally did something about it! -- -paul pmartz@dsd.es.com Evans & Sutherland
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991May9.143213.23039@dsd.es.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!uunet!orca!undies!pmartzReferences:
<5862@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1991May3.230122.13004@dsd.es.com> <MIKEG.91May4101055@c3.c3.lanl.gov> <3045@cod.NOSC.MIL> <A|_*YD*.16069@cheers.Bungi.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!uunet!orca!undies!pmartz From: pmartz@undies.dsd.es.com (Paul Martz) Newsgroups: comp.org.acm Subject: Re: New format of CACM Message-ID: <1991May9.143213.23039@dsd.es.com> Date: 9 May 91 14:32:13 GMT References: <5862@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1991May3.230122.13004@dsd.es.com> <MIKEG.91May4101055@c3.c3.lanl.gov> <3045@cod.NOSC.MIL> <A|_*YD*.16069@cheers.Bungi.COM> Sender: usenet@dsd.es.com Reply-To: pmartz@undies.dsd.es.com (Paul Martz) Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp., Salt Lake City, UT Lines: 16 Nntp-Posting-Host: 130.187.85.56