🚀 go-pugleaf

While the debate rages on about CACM - I *much* preferred the old format
which had the benefit of readability and *not* feeling like a 
here-today-trash-tomorrow trade magazine - am I alone in feeling that
ACM Computing Surveys actually could do with a face lift?

Given the small format, two columns of six-and-one-hypehenated-half words 
per column seems ridiculous. The fonts used also seem cramped and hard
to read. A single column page set in (say) Times Roman would be much
easier to read.

The content (and easy-to-find contents list) are good though. (I thought
the recent article on "What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About
Floating Point" particularly good.)

The only other improvement I would make is to put a few keywords on the
spine to make it easy to find articles or issues on a particular subject.