🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1845@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au>, georges@cs.uq.oz.au (George Semeczko)
says:
>
>Has anyone else experienced any problems e-mailing to the ACM (or
>even has anyone received e-mail replies from them) or am I just
>having mail problems that I don't know about.

George,
   Although I've sent just a few notes to ACM, the response was quick,
within 24 hours, I would say. I take it that you are sending your
inquiry to   ACMHELP@ACMVM   ?

>So if anyone can tell me what they know about the current state of
>e-mail to the ACM I would be very greatful.

If you check this list, about a week ago, I posted a gripe about the
size of the ACM stubs. The next day, I had E-mail back from someone
at ACM who obviously reads this list (or bit.listserv.acm-l at least)
who let me know that they are using up their stock of the oversized
stuff. I don't know why you aren't getting a response from them. Does
your mailer have an ACK option on your notes? Go figure!

Brought to you by the sick mind of
Bob Jackiewicz, writer of wrongs, wronger of rights.
BITNET:   U09046@UICVM                        "Touch my monkey!"  -Dieter
InterNet: U09046@UICVM.UIC.EDU
                               "Those people [who copycat movie murders]
"A European swallow or an       should not only be put in jail, but should
African swallow?" -Python, M.   also be sued for plagiarism!" -Stephen King