🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1991Jun5.174820.9058@athena.cs.uga.edu> greg@athena.cs.uga.edu (Greg Whitlock) writes:
>The University of Georgia does not print a class/professor evaluation.
>A suggestion was made for our chapter of the ACM to distribute, collect,
>compile, and make available class/professor evaluations.  [...]
>
>My question is:  Do any other chapters of the ACM do this?  If so, can
>		 someone converse with me on the best approach?

I think this topic will be watched with interest by many student chapters.

When I was in school at Cal State Univ, Chico, we had the same question.
(Though the school does evaluations, the results are confidential.)  Our final
decision was that it was much too political.  The ACM chapter at CSU Chico
depends on faculty support in several ways.  We decided that, if we were going
to do anything of that kind, the survey results would only go toward awards
for the best instructors.  It was the only politically safe approach to take.

Professor evaluations are a good idea.  The problem is that your chapter may be
too close to the action not to be affected by the results.
---
#include                                                     <std-disclaimer.h>
#define      UTS                     (( Unix System V ) + ( Amdahl mainframe ))
Ian Kluft                              UTS Systems Software, Amdahl Corporation
ikluft@uts.amdahl.com                                           Santa Clara, CA