🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.org.acm
Article #524

Re: class/professor evaluations

#524
From: Craig Partridge
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1991 06:56
18 lines
1478 bytes
In <a31801wv86X.00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> ikluft@uts.amdahl.com (Ian Kluft) writes:

>Professor evaluations are a good idea.  The problem is that your chapter may be
>too close to the action not to be affected by the results.

My experience suggests that objective evaluations (printing means and
deviations from student evaluations using numbers), and allowing faculty
to review the form (not approve, review), goes a long way to keeping folks
happy.  If you allow students to write comments (which are very helpful to
instructors), don't print them.  Just print the numbers.  Also, make copies
of all own forms available to the professors after the end of the term.

Another trick I've seen is to allow professors to decide if they want to
be evaluated if their course isn't one of the required ones for the
degree.  (Actually, Harvard lets any professor opt out for any course,
but there's some polite pressure to permit evaluation of major courses).

Craig
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1991Jun11.065621.2453@sics.se>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!sics.se!craig
References: <1991Jun5.174820.9058@athena.cs.uga.edu> <a31801wv86X.00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!sics.se!craig
From: craig@sics.se (Craig Partridge)
Newsgroups: comp.org.acm
Subject: Re: class/professor evaluations
Message-ID: <1991Jun11.065621.2453@sics.se>
Date: 11 Jun 91 06:56:21 GMT
References: <1991Jun5.174820.9058@athena.cs.uga.edu> <a31801wv86X.00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>
Sender: news@sics.se
Organization: Swedish Institute of Computer Science, Kista
Lines: 18