🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1991Jun20.113548.10151@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> lhsux@hercules.UUCP (Lorne Schachter) writes:
>>
>>Add me to the list of people that don't like the CACM's now-not-so-new format.
>>The fonts used in the articles are incredibly hard on the eyes.
>>
>>Brian
>
>The list of complaints has been going on for a while now and there have been
>no comments from anyone at the ACM about it.  Does anyone there read this
>group or do we have to overload them with email to get their attention?
       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>
>						Lorne

I think that it might be worth a try.  I have had good responce from ACMHELP
as long as I ask for a confermation from them.  I must admit that while I am
not as displeased with the new CACM format as some, and I am getting tired
of this thread, I too am not pleased with it and its use of fonts and "cute
pictures".  I personally would like this thread to end here and those who
wish to continue it take it to ACMHELP. 

Victor

=============================================================================
Victor Kohnke                    | Duke University School of Law
kohnke@faculity.law.duke.edu     | Durham, NC    (919) 684-2298
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Duke University Law School, Duke University as a whole, my former English
Teachers, family and friends formally disavow any connection with me if any
statement made is either offensive, contains inaccurate information or is
grammatically incorrect.
=============================================================================