Local ACM groups -- why so quiet?

Article View: comp.org.acm

Article #566

#566

From: Ken Bell
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 08:28

15 lines
1046 bytes

As an ACM member for over two years now, it wasn't until a month
or so ago that I found a New York City ACM meeting (oddly enough,
through an advertisement in the NY Times Classified section!).

Maybe I'm just naive (;->) but I kinda assumed that if such a
group existed, they'd have sent me a notice, considering that
the international group obviously has me listed as a New Yawker.

Don't the local and central groups share mailing lists?  Gee whiz!

(BTW, I still haven't been sent a renewal form, if such a thing
exists, by the NYC group.  Guess I'd better call them.)

---
Ken Bell (kenbell@panix.com  -or-  syklb@nasagiss.giss.nasa.gov)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <C1AsvI.437@panix.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!cmcl2!panix!kenbell

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.org.acm
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!cmcl2!panix!kenbell
From: kenbell@panix.com (Ken Bell)
Subject: Local ACM groups -- why so quiet?
Message-ID: <C1AsvI.437@panix.com>
Summary: Why don't local ACM groups let people know they're there?
Keywords: Local NYC ACM Advertise
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 08:28:30 GMT
Lines: 16