Re: New format of CACM

Article View: comp.org.acm

Article #354

#354

From: Charles H. Sampson
Date: Mon, 06 May 1991 20:32

5 lines
632 bytes

     Count me as one of those against the new format.  I agree with every
negative thing that's been said about it so far.

                                Charlie

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3045@cod.NOSC.MIL>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ucselx!ucsd!nosc!cod!sampson

References: <5862@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1991May3.230122.13004@dsd.es.com> <MIKEG.91May4101055@c3.c3.lanl.gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ucselx!ucsd!nosc!cod!sampson
From: sampson@cod.NOSC.MIL (Charles H. Sampson)
Newsgroups: comp.org.acm
Subject: Re: New format of CACM
Message-ID: <3045@cod.NOSC.MIL>
Date: 6 May 91 20:32:42 GMT
References: <5862@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1991May3.230122.13004@dsd.es.com> <MIKEG.91May4101055@c3.c3.lanl.gov>
Organization: Computer Sciences Corporation
Lines: 5

Reply to Parent Message