Article View: comp.org.decus
Article #145Re: Membership fee for DECUS?
From: Paul Repacholi
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1992 11:03
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1992 11:03
47 lines
2859 bytes
2859 bytes
In article <hdtodd.2.714835604@wccnet.wcc.wesleyan.edu>, hdtodd@wccnet.wcc.wesleyan.edu (H. D. Todd) writes: > In article <1992Aug25.140249.3686@spcvxb.spc.edu> killeen@spcvxb.spc.edu > (Jeff Killeen) writes: >>Subject: Re: Membership fee for DECUS? ... I don't have the details at hand, so don't take it to literaly. > > The nominal membership of DECUS/US is about 50K. The real > membership is about 25-30K. The audits we implemented (six years ago or so) > were never fully implemented to trim the mailing list as we had intended. > If a major goal is to save mailing costs and trees, DECUS could just > eliminate the mailing-list names of inactive members -- and tighten the > definition of "inactive". (I'd now fall into that category, I think.) > The .AU audit is done every few years. Members are posted an audit form to complete and post back in a post paid envelope. This allows for change in SIGs etc as well. No return, off the lists. Takes 2 min to do. > Customers pay for services, and the fees include overhead for DECUS > operations. So they pay for "membership" through purchases. No purchases, > no membership (i.e., they get trimmed from the list after a couple of > years of inactivity). Or, no newsletter/library contributions, they get > trimmed (i.e., they are neither contributing nor using DECUS resources, so > they are probably uninterested; reinstate upon request). > different members will have differnt wants/needs, and this will result in different 'visibility'. ... > If the problem is wasted trees and money for mailings that don't > interest people, solve that problem. If the problem is an uninformed > electorate, solve that problem. I don't think DECUS needs membership fees > to solve either problem. It does need a consistent and coherent strategy > for funding, for representation, and for effective management. Membership > fees might be part of the solution for the first and last, but not for the > representation issue. > We have added 'Corporate Membership' to .AU Decus. This gives the CM the Vax SIG tapes and a few other things on one bill, hence easier to get through the bean counters. No vote. they can send 5 nominees to symposia etc. About $1000 AU per year. ~Paul
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep1.200349.1@cc.curtin.edu.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!cujo!cc.curtin.edu.au!zrepacholReferences:
<1992Aug21.120610.974@beckman.com> <1992Aug25.090559.686@fps.mcw.edu> <1992Aug25.140249.3686@spcvxb.spc.edu> <hdtodd.2.714835604@wccnet.wcc.wesleyan.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.org.decus Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!cujo!cc.curtin.edu.au!zrepachol From: zrepachol@cc.curtin.edu.au (Paul Repacholi) Subject: Re: Membership fee for DECUS? Message-ID: <1992Sep1.200349.1@cc.curtin.edu.au> Lines: 48 Sender: news@cujo.curtin.edu.au (News Manager) Organization: Curtin University of Technology References: <1992Aug21.120610.974@beckman.com> <1992Aug25.090559.686@fps.mcw.edu> <1992Aug25.140249.3686@spcvxb.spc.edu> <hdtodd.2.714835604@wccnet.wcc.wesleyan.edu> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 11:03:49 GMT