🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Apr7.184247.16692@umbc3.umbc.edu>, klr@umbc4.umbc.edu (Kurt Reisler) writes:
> In article <1992Apr7.084940.1565@merrimack.edu> rand@merrimack.edu writes:
>>In article <69874@ut-emx.uucp>, mknox@bongo.cc.utexas.edu (Margaret Knox) writes:
>>> 	The auditing firm of King and McNamara has reported the results of 
>>> the 1992 voting for Directors of the DECUS U.S. Chapter Board. The winning 
>>> candidates, in alphabetical order are:
>>
>>Was there a numeric tally posted. The pessimist in me would like to
>>know the relative dissatisfaction of the membership with the above
>>candidates and resolution.
>>
> 
> I do not believe that I have ever seen an official posting of the actual
> voter counts in any DECUS election.  I also do not believe that there is
> a provision to provide one.

In the past the numbers have been given to the candidates, announced at the 
open Board meeting at Symposia, and published in the Q1 issue of DECUScope.

In chatting with one the candidates the numbers were approx...

	Total Ballots = 8000

	1. 4600 votes\
	2. 4400 votes  \
	3. 4100 votes  /------ Don't think your vote counts? (It does)
	4. 4000 votes/
	5. 3000 votes
	6. 2000 votes

These numbers are unofficial and 2nd hand. In the last election there was about 
10,000 ballots.